From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-kernel+bounces-889-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781051381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 04:14:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93571E093A;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 04:14:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0031BE08ED
	for <gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 04:14:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE59210A0
	for <gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:14:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160])
  by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:14:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout;
	 bh=khqiIEc/ZH88H8C7ZMZdFgbq/hA=; b=bxCs2WIu4trTxAAB9UNigAvFa0th
	5PE6eiR1xploUSSlh3GCv/OwWMyG7EJqLCGkf95B3xZ9pj+cHPzZMtuFtCXYF8+y
	HanyVWvE2xiJlqVomKQdIr7cHkEoBuTYORxYeV85j0AGXBic+nT+fGjs0jEAhFI7
	T0YKUnyQWvNmb3E=
X-Sasl-enc: 7sMK84EdIDXAfT0xUcUJJFbpfgGcHZxuaFoD3mP2AqB9 1372306481
Received: from localhost (unknown [76.28.172.123])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 07C03C00E82;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:14:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:15:25 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked
 stable for obsolete versions
Message-ID: <20130627041525.GA19047@kroah.com>
References: <20130621145801.GA5202@kroah.com>
 <20130622020259.7a411a7a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
 <20130622001303.GA2278@kroah.com>
 <20130622024516.3a51911e@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
 <20130622034243.GA2058@kroah.com>
 <20130622084525.2d1fa03f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
 <20130624162710.GA16499@kroah.com>
 <51C909DB.2000802@gmail.com>
 <CAM3ZnqpkLM7vLi85tYymKrkGSSk6JoOFMnHUvF7nNgVURNVUaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-kernel+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-kernel+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-kernel+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-kernel.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM3ZnqpkLM7vLi85tYymKrkGSSk6JoOFMnHUvF7nNgVURNVUaQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 88114a5f-7aaf-4faa-ba69-1b87a0348beb
X-Archives-Hash: de15f012bea2caa071ed1c751e08c8e4

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:18:12AM -0400, Douglas Dunn wrote:
> A users perspective about vanilla-kernel, but why not just mirror whats
> available on kernel.org. keep it simple with the versions they offer there,
> with their longterm stable and slowly remove their EOL, maybe give a warning
> there till its gone from kernel and then make it gone from the tree.

That's exactly what I am proposing, but keeping everything marked
"unstable" as there's no time to mark them stable before the next
release comes out with fixes that should be applied.

thanks,

greg k-h