From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A2D198005 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 809E1E05D5; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.127]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC249E05CB for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from primapratica.localnet ([90.61.248.113]) by mwinf5d09 with ME id EBik1l00G2TYHE203Bj3vq; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:43:05 +0100 From: "Eric F. GARIOUD" To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] [ANNOUNCE] genpatches-3.8-7 release Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:43:29 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.10-ck-r1.1; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20130321103157.D36A033C878@smtp.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20130321103157.D36A033C878@smtp.gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201303211243.29502.eric-f.garioud@wanadoo.fr> X-Archives-Salt: 3f64effb-831b-4992-8cdc-985604fa5225 X-Archives-Hash: 9fb05138794e4a65b40faa3749bcb365 On Thursday 21 March 2013 11:31:55 Tom Wijsman wrote: > Added: 1069_linux-3.0.70.patch > Added: 1040_linux-3.2.41.patch > Added: 1036_linux-3.4.37.patch > Added: 1003_linux-3.8.4.patch Should I understand from this that the gentoo-sources project gets no intention to port the security fixes back to the 3.7 and 3.6 branches ? In case of a positive answer and in case I would port the security fixes back to the 3.6 branch myself, would you accept to package & distribute the result as genpatches ?