From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OS5l8-0002jx-Kl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:03:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44046E097D for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DD7E08F2 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (95-24-3-91.broadband.corbina.ru [95.24.3.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F3B41B42FF for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] Stabilizing kernels From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4C226522.9020000@gentoo.org> References: <4C226522.9020000@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:18:50 +0400 Message-ID: <1277457530.22834.39.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 67f0ad61-9f0e-403e-ac2e-9ab9bcec7d6d X-Archives-Hash: d6a55e40ee72479e2a906ef820abe4ed =D0=92 =D0=A1=D1=80=D0=B4, 23/06/2010 =D0=B2 20:48 +0100, Krzysztof Pawli= k =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > There's and interesting question: how should kernels different than > gentoo-sources and vanilla-sources be stabilized? So far I was trying t= o match > base kernel version + genpatches version of tuxonice-sources to gentoo-= sources > (ie. when gentoo-sources-2.6.X-rY goes stable I would file a separate b= ug to > have tuxonice-sources-2.6.X-rZ stabilized too). >=20 > There's abug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D320071 about sta= bilizing > few tuxonice-sources versions, but it's been quiet since a month. >=20 > My question is: should be stabilize non-core (everything other than > {gentoo,vanilla}-sources)? Opinions? >=20 > I'm more and more in favor of having tuxonice-sources and ck-sources on= ly in ~arch. For openvz-sources we have arrangement with arch teams and I mark them stable by myself as soon as I think they are stable enough. I guess you could do the same. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D198632 --=20 Peter.