From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DoHVg-0002pv-Ep
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:08:33 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6197V5D001715;
	Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:07:31 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6197UWn022041
	for <gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:07:30 GMT
Received: from fw2.pil.dk ([83.90.227.58] helo=[192.168.10.78])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DoHVd-0000aP-Qr
	for gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:08:30 +0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] kernel-2.eclass: Easier way to use genpatches
	in ebuilds
From: Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <42B95F0D.1040408@gentoo.org>
References: <42B95F0D.1040408@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-H4RngFz9u/cIRXefVf0A"
Organization: Gentoo Metadistribution
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:08:28 +0200
Message-Id: <1120208908.14882.1.camel@sponge.fungus>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-kernel+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-kernel+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-kernel+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-kernel.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 
X-Archives-Salt: 50c45fa8-8c76-4172-a143-edc4a3397427
X-Archives-Hash: 4186c0c44cbdabe9be9c6c551fe43a08


--=-H4RngFz9u/cIRXefVf0A
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 13:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Any comments?

Shouldn't kernel-2::handle_genpatches() add the 0000_README file to
UNIPATCH_DOCS if found? Or was this left out on purpose?

Sincerely,
Brix
--=20
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd

--=-H4RngFz9u/cIRXefVf0A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCxQgMv+Q4flTiePgRAgsBAJ0YROkILfEG1PWOjm/Evz4tdeDsGACgn+DS
P6Se/h2UFryqhEy1hh0VCM0=
=UA+J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-H4RngFz9u/cIRXefVf0A--

-- 
gentoo-kernel@gentoo.org mailing list