From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FQJhD-0006J8-Ku for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 07:41:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k337fQUE020230; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 07:41:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k337fPx9017710 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 07:41:25 GMT Received: from [82.94.219.123] (helo=redcube.nl) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FQJgi-0003t4-QA for gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 07:41:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (dsl238-21.fastxdsl.nl [62.251.21.238]) by redcube.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7BE721F7 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:41:20 +0200 To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission From: "Vincent Schut" Organization: sarvision.nl Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera M2/8.52 (Linux, build 1631) X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k337fPx9017710 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k337fQUc020230 X-Archives-Salt: 6225d8c2-5454-4379-8398-ee35938738d6 X-Archives-Hash: ac6c7b711cda4a151b5c92eb1e7e5a73 On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols =20 wrote: > Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: >> Miroslav =C5=A0ulc writes: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we u= se >>> bugs.gentoo.org? >>> >>> >> >> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much... >> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac? >> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once) >> >> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem, >> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know about = it >> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or WONTFI= X. >> >> >> > I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad. Although= , =20 > it would be preferred if bugs directly to =20 > java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, so we don't drive =20 > bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template' and = =20 > setup a tinyurl for it: > > *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha* > > Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be =20 > preset to be assigned to java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, = =20 > block the migration bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the title. I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr. =20 127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See the =20 following reply I got: Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay] tomcat-5.5.1= 6 =20 works for amd64 To: schut@sarvision.nl From: bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000 --------- start forward --------- Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D127949 Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D127949 jakub@gentoo.org changed: What |Removed |Added -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- CC| |java@gentoo.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |UPSTREAM ------- Comment #1 from jakub@gentoo.org 2006-03-29 01:05 PST ------- Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. --------- end forward --------- Cheers, Vincent. > > Regards, > Josh --=20 gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list