From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QPdOv-0007rp-Ed for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:27:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90E4F1C193; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF541C193 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:25:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75CA1B4007 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:25:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -4.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.909 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.690, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQ5fTxO3MxX6 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1BF1B4008 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 16:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QPdNa-0007xv-FS for gentoo-java@gentoo.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:25:46 +0200 Received: from hsi-kbw-078-042-100-035.hsi3.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([78.42.100.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:25:46 +0200 Received: from joerg.schaible by hsi-kbw-078-042-100-035.hsi3.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 18:25:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-java@gentoo.org To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ? Followup-To: gmane.linux.gentoo.java Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:25:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4DD923B5.6060508@codelutin.com> <4DD985FA.3020904@gentoo.org> <4DDA00D4.3060603@gentoo.org> <4DDB753E.4020908@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hsi-kbw-078-042-100-035.hsi3.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6d680f5bd82be9c12d154fca8733cf9b J=C3=B6rg Schaible wrote: > Kasun Gajasinghe wrote: >=20 >> Hi J=C3=B6rg, and Robert, >>=20 >>>> FWIW one unresolved challenge for linux distributions with the rise = of >>>> bytecode languages (such as Java) is that compressed bytecodes are n= ot >>>> binaries in the usual sense (platform dependent machine executable >>>> machine code). i know that it's a hard thing for the linux community >>>> to hear but it's about time that the community acknowledged that the= se >>>> languages are now mainstream and stop trying to force them into a >>>> inappropriate provisioning model. >>=20 >> So... what exactly are you suggesting? Switch in to using binaries >> instead of building from source paradigm? >=20 > For Java: Yes. Use flags are still useful for dropping optional deps. I > recommended that already years ago. I really meant years ... http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.java/43 - J=C3=B6rg