From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-java+bounces-759-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1GQSvT-0000hZ-Ln
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:05:32 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8LI4fYg011000;
	Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:04:41 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8LI4eBd031891
	for <gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:04:40 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so874710wxc
        for <gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Vctb1qAxazykbETq0vv7n6ppZLg5DKLUVJJ17x6UX6e2/UmvzO/BIGdIRKO+/1ygM37f0NvcvfV5DjJJo0gT/m09Hfx7m8M6UjMK2JzcC6wjggZ9644zwTJZgrMDuDjOGXyN2GU4PdJnug1MtAnhQqqWrs7h59Yi54R/evwGsCQ=
Received: by 10.70.80.14 with SMTP id d14mr27408417wxb;
        Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.19.18 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9e0cf0bf0609211104n79f51d40vab4acf9fb66546a1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:04:40 +0300
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon.barlev@gmail.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka" <caster@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] generation-2 java eclass
Cc: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <4512D2C4.4000908@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-java+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-java+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-java+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-java.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200609152007.32247.alon.barlev@gmail.com>
	 <450C8B52.8050707@gentoo.org>
	 <200609201307.51119.alon.barlev@gmail.com>
	 <4511A52B.2010700@gentoo.org> <4511C3B6.5020802@gentoo.org>
	 <9e0cf0bf0609202205l3b79649y93e87f84ab3cdc79@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4512D2C4.4000908@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 9cf212b9-064a-42aa-a0ca-59a39cff83ba
X-Archives-Hash: 83e1bac00e3560173ae07af1db8ce9b4

On 9/21/06, Vlastimil Babka <caster@gentoo.org> wrote:
> No, EXPORT_FUNCTIONS is for exporting the phases itself, not phase
> hooks. Both seem to solve conflict in a way that the later
> defined/inherited wins, so in the end you get one phase function and one
> phase hook.

Thanks!

But what happens if two eclasses have phase hook?
Both of them should be called, right?
But if one overwrite the other, only the last one will be called.
-- 
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list