From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H701b-0003oU-Oo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:55:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0H1stnm023823; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:54:55 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0H1srx2032547 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:54:54 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so3418938wxd for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:54:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qLGh9fcpxF3dK0rfOxgmh4g6LD62G2lSAzXnp1AxiasWIoHGJXpIrnqoL5+bTp5RmVP71pLFTMBt/0pyQc5LAqOZeKFq38txw/F2l5GffXIy/Zzi9Ap7K13sT1ZlvRyW+XoUFeO8bZmG737d9BqUrbyQXJSdynroIAruFihbw9Q= Received: by 10.90.90.3 with SMTP id n3mr2876874agb.1168998893333; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.93.9 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:54:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <93e475bc0701161754qe7e133k411b0dab2272865f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:54:53 +1300 From: "Alistair Bush" To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Weka package cleanup In-Reply-To: <93e475bc0701161708k36086817j38518b373149c367@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_90859_20124391.1168998893243" References: <93e475bc0701161132s19786436p8b241e22a163ec68@mail.gmail.com> <45AD2FBB.5040001@gentoo.org> <9e0cf0bf0701161234u48924125t1067de35252c6371@mail.gmail.com> <45AD3AE8.6020402@gentoo.org> <9e0cf0bf0701161255s695622abi19922367aa57799f@mail.gmail.com> <93e475bc0701161453y2488c4al4dae0e787a703b27@mail.gmail.com> <1168990676.13072.8.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> <93e475bc0701161607s5ca219fcx1a03cca7f6acbfc3@mail.gmail.com> <45AD74FA.5060307@gentoo.org> <93e475bc0701161708k36086817j38518b373149c367@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 82641e67-c860-49a2-bbf0-2b00480b1622 X-Archives-Hash: 014f5b70e3ddc76d23f53c91b8eecd45 ------=_Part_90859_20124391.1168998893243 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Do we still have a list generated that tells us of all the gen-1 packages remaining? On 1/17/07, Alistair Bush wrote: > > That sounds like a good idea. > > On 1/17/07, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Alistair Bush wrote: > > > I have also though of going thru bugs.gentoo.org > > > and reassigning the priority of bugs into > > > categories (rather a large job for anyone who has other projects they > > > want to get kicking). > > > > And I would love to mark stable/keyword requests in a way that I can > > filter them easily. They are assigned to us but we are not the ones > > solving them :) Be it a special component or keyword, or some unified > > form of summary. I see there are already STABLE and TESTED keywords for > > arch testers to mark stuff they've tested, so maybe add something > > STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ? What do you think? If it's sane, it should > > probably be discussed on gentoo-dev as some global policy. > > - -- > > Vlastimil Babka (Caster) > > Gentoo/Java > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iD8DBQFFrXT5tbrAj05h3oQRAtj7AJ9ydkaYZBKom7qZ0R6/lTlpSqbnHgCfWvKl > > hs3etexbXWaWM8N6WTtOHQQ= > > =ndHV > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > > gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > ------=_Part_90859_20124391.1168998893243 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Do we still have a list generated that tells us of all the gen-1 packages remaining?


On 1/17/07, Alistair Bush < alistair.bush@gmail.com> wrote:
That sounds like a good idea.


On 1/17/07, Vlastimil Babka <caster@gentoo.org > wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alistair Bush wrote:
> I have also though of going thru bugs.gentoo.org
> <http://bugs.gentoo.org > and reassigning the priority of bugs into
> categories (rather a large job for anyone who has other projects they
> want to get kicking).

And I would love to mark stable/keyword requests in a way that I can
filter them easily. They are assigned to us but we are not the ones
solving them :) Be it a special component or keyword, or some unified
form of summary. I see there are already STABLE and TESTED keywords for
arch testers to mark stuff they've tested, so maybe add something
STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ? What do you think? If it's sane, it should
probably be discussed on gentoo-dev as some global policy.
- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFrXT5tbrAj05h3oQRAtj7AJ9ydkaYZBKom7qZ0R6/lTlpSqbnHgCfWvKl
hs3etexbXWaWM8N6WTtOHQQ=
=ndHV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list



------=_Part_90859_20124391.1168998893243-- -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list