Do we still have a list generated that tells us of all the gen-1 packages
remaining?


On 1/17/07, Alistair Bush <alistair.bush@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That sounds like a good idea.
>
> On 1/17/07, Vlastimil Babka <caster@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Alistair Bush wrote:
> > > I have also though of going thru bugs.gentoo.org
> > > <http://bugs.gentoo.org > and reassigning the priority of bugs into
> > > categories (rather a large job for anyone who has other projects they
> > > want to get kicking).
> >
> > And I would love to mark stable/keyword requests in a way that I can
> > filter them easily. They are assigned to us but we are not the ones
> > solving them :) Be it a special component or keyword, or some unified
> > form of summary. I see there are already STABLE and TESTED keywords for
> > arch testers to mark stuff they've tested, so maybe add something
> > STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ? What do you think? If it's sane, it should
> > probably be discussed on gentoo-dev as some global policy.
> > - --
> > Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
> > Gentoo/Java
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iD8DBQFFrXT5tbrAj05h3oQRAtj7AJ9ydkaYZBKom7qZ0R6/lTlpSqbnHgCfWvKl
> > hs3etexbXWaWM8N6WTtOHQQ=
> > =ndHV
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > --
> > gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
>