Re: [gentoo-java] Weka package cleanup

["Alistair Bush" <alistair.bush@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1238 bytes --]

That sounds like a good idea.

On 1/17/07, Vlastimil Babka <caster@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alistair Bush wrote:
> > I have also though of going thru bugs.gentoo.org
> > <http://bugs.gentoo.org> and reassigning the priority of bugs into
> > categories (rather a large job for anyone who has other projects they
> > want to get kicking).
>
> And I would love to mark stable/keyword requests in a way that I can
> filter them easily. They are assigned to us but we are not the ones
> solving them :) Be it a special component or keyword, or some unified
> form of summary. I see there are already STABLE and TESTED keywords for
> arch testers to mark stuff they've tested, so maybe add something
> STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ? What do you think? If it's sane, it should
> probably be discussed on gentoo-dev as some global policy.
> - --
> Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
> Gentoo/Java
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFFrXT5tbrAj05h3oQRAtj7AJ9ydkaYZBKom7qZ0R6/lTlpSqbnHgCfWvKl
> hs3etexbXWaWM8N6WTtOHQQ=
> =ndHV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1733 bytes --]