From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I6042-0005Ss-72 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 08:18:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l648HX6a002648; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:17:33 GMT Received: from argos.quirk.co.za (gateway.quirk.co.za [196.36.166.25]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l648H5iT002606 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:17:13 GMT Message-ID: <582021.126311183537013768.JavaMail.root@argos.quirk.co.za> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Quirk References: <45B33BA3.9060106@gentoo.org> <27731379.1169408363698.JavaMail.root@mardin.quirk.co.za> In-Reply-To: <27731379.1169408363698.JavaMail.root@mardin.quirk.co.za> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk; d=quirk.biz; h=received:date:from:user-agent:to:subject:content-type; b=HBZQXSm19L3BJ90Omin6x2yRaOTn3PUK3nOdma0FccZ3fJGUDb8HTkJGDHmGaJYyvYRT5o4RlKtv Pcm/rIrXMQ== Received: from 192.168.0.209 ([192.168.0.209]) by argos.quirk.co.za (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.1) with SMTP ID 118 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:16:52 +0200 (SAST) Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 10:16:39 +0200 From: Craig Raw User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l648HX75002648 X-Archives-Salt: 25389957-984d-452f-8d87-feca5145a7e4 X-Archives-Hash: 031440ada97104c85526fe051d16bd01 Hi all, I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179=20 (http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=3D6507179) was keepin= g Java 6 masked on Gentoo -=20 it has been fixed in this release. Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date= ? Ciao, Craig Alistair Bush wrote: > what an absolute bugger!! I wish java would let us win at least one=20 > battle. >=20 > On 1/21/07, *Petteri R=E4ty* > wrote: >=20 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D158720 > >=20 > So some packages fail to build javadocs with >=3Dsun-jdk-1.6. As ev= eryone > did not seem to be aware on how to handled this the right DEPEND > atom is: > doc? ( || ( =3Dvirtual/jdk-1.4* =3D virtual/jdk-1.5* ) ) > !doc? ( >=3Dvirtual/jdk-1.4 ) >=20 > RDEPEND: > >=3Dvirtual/jre-1.4 >=20 > Regards, > Petteri >=20 > PS. If someone was wondering, this bug prevents sun-jdk-1.6 going s= table > until all packages have been tested to build javadocs with it. > -- > gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list >=20 >=20 --=20 gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list