[gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

[gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

[Petteri Räty]

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720

So some packages fail to build javadocs with >=sun-jdk-1.6. As everyone
did not seem to be aware on how to handled this the right DEPEND atom is:
doc? ( || ( =virtual/jdk-1.4* = virtual/jdk-1.5* ) )
!doc? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4 )

RDEPEND:
>=virtual/jre-1.4

Regards,
Petteri

PS. If someone was wondering, this bug prevents sun-jdk-1.6 going stable
until all packages have been tested to build javadocs with it.
-- 
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

[Alistair Bush]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 692 bytes --]

what an absolute bugger!!   I wish java would let us win at least one
battle.

On 1/21/07, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720
>
> So some packages fail to build javadocs with >=sun-jdk-1.6. As everyone
> did not seem to be aware on how to handled this the right DEPEND atom is:
> doc? ( || ( =virtual/jdk-1.4* = virtual/jdk-1.5* ) )
> !doc? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4 )
>
> RDEPEND:
> >=virtual/jre-1.4
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
> PS. If someone was wondering, this bug prevents sun-jdk-1.6 going stable
> until all packages have been tested to build javadocs with it.
> --
> gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1097 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

[Craig Raw]

Hi all,

I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179 
(http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6507179) was keeping Java 6 masked on Gentoo - 
it has been fixed in this release.

Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date?

Ciao,
Craig


Alistair Bush wrote:
> what an absolute bugger!!   I wish java would let us win at least one 
> battle.
> 
> On 1/21/07, *Petteri Räty* <betelgeuse@gentoo.org 
> <mailto:betelgeuse@gentoo.org>> wrote:
> 
>     https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720
>     <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158720>
> 
>     So some packages fail to build javadocs with >=sun-jdk-1.6. As everyone
>     did not seem to be aware on how to handled this the right DEPEND
>     atom is:
>     doc? ( || ( =virtual/jdk-1.4* = virtual/jdk-1.5* ) )
>     !doc? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4 )
> 
>     RDEPEND:
>      >=virtual/jre-1.4
> 
>     Regards,
>     Petteri
> 
>     PS. If someone was wondering, this bug prevents sun-jdk-1.6 going stable
>     until all packages have been tested to build javadocs with it.
>     --
>     gentoo-java@gentoo.org <mailto:gentoo-java@gentoo.org> mailing list
> 
> 

-- 
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

[Petteri Räty]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 680 bytes --]

Craig Raw kirjoitti:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179
> (http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6507179) was keeping
> Java 6 masked on Gentoo - it has been fixed in this release.
> 
> Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date?
> 
> Ciao,
> Craig
> 

https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html

They first need to release the DLJ bundles, then we package it and we
should think about getting it stable one month from now. It does break
jdbc api so I do need to write a script for the arch teams to install
all stable java stuff to test with.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

[David Herron]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 963 bytes --]


And, Tom Marble, who handles making the DLJ bundles, is on vacation 
right now.  Unfortunately this process isn't automated.

I'll look into what it would take to get the bundles published.

- David



Petteri Räty wrote:
> Craig Raw kirjoitti:
>   
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179
>> (http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6507179) was keeping
>> Java 6 masked on Gentoo - it has been fixed in this release.
>>
>> Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date?
>>
>> Ciao,
>> Craig
>>
>>     
>
> https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html
>
> They first need to release the DLJ bundles, then we package it and we
> should think about getting it stable one month from now. It does break
> jdbc api so I do need to write a script for the arch teams to install
> all stable java stuff to test with.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
>   

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1554 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-java] Handling broken javadoc in >=sun-jdk-1.6

[David Herron]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1166 bytes --]

I just checked and learned that the DLJ bundles should be published 
tomorrow (that's by the USA/PDT timezone).

- David Herron



David Herron wrote:
>
> And, Tom Marble, who handles making the DLJ bundles, is on vacation 
> right now.  Unfortunately this process isn't automated.
>
> I'll look into what it would take to get the bundles published.
>
> - David
>
>
>
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Craig Raw kirjoitti:
>>   
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've noticed Java 6u2 has just been released. AFAIK, bug 6507179
>>> (http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6507179) was keeping
>>> Java 6 masked on Gentoo - it has been fixed in this release.
>>>
>>> Does this help in terms of getting Java 6 stable? Or am I way out of date?
>>>
>>> Ciao,
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html
>>
>> They first need to release the DLJ bundles, then we package it and we
>> should think about getting it stable one month from now. It does break
>> jdbc api so I do need to write a script for the arch teams to install
>> all stable java stuff to test with.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Petteri
>>
>>   


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1918 bytes --]