public inbox for gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nico R." <n-roeser@gmx.net>
To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Building an open source NetBeans
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:14:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDE9880.9080304@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC959AD.3060002@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1994 bytes --]

Hello!

Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) wrote on 2011-05-10:
> first of all, i miss "restrictions report" for netbeans 7.0 :-) that one
> is where most of my effort went last months.

Sorry, it seems that I forgot to add that paragraph. %-)

> fast grep for the two
> mentioned packages, jnlp-bin and jsr67 shows that 7.0 depends just on
> jsr67, jnlp-bin is not needed anymore.

I have not changed which NetBeans modules to install. So netbeans pulls
in netbeans-java, which depends on appframework, which tries to install
jnlp-bin. :-(

dev-java/netbeans-java-7.0 also depends on dev-java/jta:0, which is
licensed under sun-bcla-jta, and therefore not free.

> 
> second, i'd like to know what is the real purpose for getting rid of the
> restrictions.

On the one hand, I do not like to have software installed on my system
which forbids (for example) reverse-engineering in its license. On the
other hand, Gentoo users like to build packages from their source code,
and not use pre-bundled binaries.

> i mention this because there are many jars that i cannot
> unbundle at all (and some that could be unbundled but we do not have
> ebuilds for these yet) and they may be restricted in some way aswell.

I always thought that NetBeans was Freely available, and under
non-discriminatory terms. Seems that I was wrong, and that Sun/Oracle is
a bit more evil than I thought. ;-)

> 
> about your jsr67 ebuild, is it the same source as the restricted jsr67
> that we have now or it is different/new package from gentoo point of view?

It used the source which I found for JSR 67, which is licensed under the
CDDL. I assume that the binaries provided by Oracle are also built from
these sources.

I also compared the APIs, and they seemed to be equal. I hope I did
everything properly. Someone could help with comparing the APIs of the
generated class files a second time.

By the way, no need to Cc me, I’m subscribed.

Happy coding!
-- 
Nico


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2011-05-26 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-10 14:57 [gentoo-java] Building an open source NetBeans Nico R.
2011-05-10 15:28 ` "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)"
2011-05-26 18:14   ` Nico R. [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DDE9880.9080304@gmx.net \
    --to=n-roeser@gmx.net \
    --cc=gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox