From: "Nico R." <n-roeser@gmx.net>
To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Building an open source NetBeans
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:14:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDE9880.9080304@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC959AD.3060002@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1994 bytes --]
Hello!
Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) wrote on 2011-05-10:
> first of all, i miss "restrictions report" for netbeans 7.0 :-) that one
> is where most of my effort went last months.
Sorry, it seems that I forgot to add that paragraph. %-)
> fast grep for the two
> mentioned packages, jnlp-bin and jsr67 shows that 7.0 depends just on
> jsr67, jnlp-bin is not needed anymore.
I have not changed which NetBeans modules to install. So netbeans pulls
in netbeans-java, which depends on appframework, which tries to install
jnlp-bin. :-(
dev-java/netbeans-java-7.0 also depends on dev-java/jta:0, which is
licensed under sun-bcla-jta, and therefore not free.
>
> second, i'd like to know what is the real purpose for getting rid of the
> restrictions.
On the one hand, I do not like to have software installed on my system
which forbids (for example) reverse-engineering in its license. On the
other hand, Gentoo users like to build packages from their source code,
and not use pre-bundled binaries.
> i mention this because there are many jars that i cannot
> unbundle at all (and some that could be unbundled but we do not have
> ebuilds for these yet) and they may be restricted in some way aswell.
I always thought that NetBeans was Freely available, and under
non-discriminatory terms. Seems that I was wrong, and that Sun/Oracle is
a bit more evil than I thought. ;-)
>
> about your jsr67 ebuild, is it the same source as the restricted jsr67
> that we have now or it is different/new package from gentoo point of view?
It used the source which I found for JSR 67, which is licensed under the
CDDL. I assume that the binaries provided by Oracle are also built from
these sources.
I also compared the APIs, and they seemed to be equal. I hope I did
everything properly. Someone could help with comparing the APIs of the
generated class files a second time.
By the way, no need to Cc me, I’m subscribed.
Happy coding!
--
Nico
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-10 14:57 [gentoo-java] Building an open source NetBeans Nico R.
2011-05-10 15:28 ` "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)"
2011-05-26 18:14 ` Nico R. [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDE9880.9080304@gmx.net \
--to=n-roeser@gmx.net \
--cc=gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox