From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 12:07:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDB753E.4020908@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin4fO5OUusb+pDitMX6TBKM4UktRw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1186 bytes --]
On 05/23/2011 07:52 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
>>
>> maven-bin 2.x support continues to work through the binary package?
>
> Yes, we can keep supporting maven-bin 2.x for maven users. Though the
> packagers of projects based on maven won't be able to use the support
> for maven 2.x if we start with 3.x.This project's focus is more
> towards packagers, right? I think Serkan or people who are more
> familiar with this can give an exact answer.
>
So are you discussing which version of Maven to build from source or
which version to target ebuild infrastructure for? Those two don't
necessarily need to be the same and your topic implied the former but
the above talks about the latter. The ebuild infrastructure for Maven
based projects should work just the same regardless of whether the maven
package itself is built from source or not. Our target is of course to
get rid of all binary packages but I consider this thread about asking
about priorities. For ebuild infrastructure targeting 2.x is fine if the
large majority of projects that will start using the work are using 2.x.
Otherwise I think my earlier logic still applies.
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-22 5:38 [gentoo-java] Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ? Kasun Gajasinghe
2011-05-22 7:38 ` [gentoo-java] " kiorky
2011-05-22 14:54 ` [gentoo-java] " Eric Chatellier
2011-05-22 21:54 ` Petteri Räty
2011-05-23 6:15 ` Kasun Gajasinghe
2011-05-23 6:38 ` Petteri Räty
2011-05-23 16:52 ` Kasun Gajasinghe
2011-05-24 9:07 ` Petteri Räty [this message]
2011-05-24 11:52 ` Kasun Gajasinghe
2011-05-25 14:33 ` Robert Burrell Donkin
2011-05-25 16:09 ` [gentoo-java] " Jörg Schaible
2011-05-26 8:44 ` Robert Burrell Donkin
2011-05-26 15:57 ` [gentoo-java] " Jörg Schaible
2011-05-26 9:06 ` [gentoo-java] " Kasun Gajasinghe
2011-05-26 10:58 ` Robert Burrell Donkin
2011-05-26 16:18 ` [gentoo-java] " Jörg Schaible
2011-05-26 16:25 ` Jörg Schaible
2011-05-26 11:10 ` [gentoo-java] " Robert Burrell Donkin
2011-05-26 16:06 ` [gentoo-java] " Jörg Schaible
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDB753E.4020908@gentoo.org \
--to=betelgeuse@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox