From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MuBd6-0005vf-D1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:55:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9322E0AE3; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dsrg.mff.cuni.cz (dsrg.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.55]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95668E0AE3 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r9.net.upc.cz ([62.24.83.9] helo=[192.168.1.112]) by dsrg.mff.cuni.cz with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MuBd3-00026V-Pk; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:54:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4AC7BA1E.3050908@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:54:54 +0200 From: Vlastimil Babka User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090909) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alistair Bush CC: Alex Legler , java@gentoo.org, Gentoo Security , gentoo-java Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: Java 5 EOL; Java GLSA References: <20090823122805.7aeb0748@neon> <200908232258.10365.ali_bush@gentoo.org> <20090915142904.52d27fea@mail.netloc.info> <200909182253.29005.ali_bush@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200909182253.29005.ali_bush@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 X-Spam-Level: ---- X-Archives-Salt: f68d5c1c-9280-4323-8951-a9077e880007 X-Archives-Hash: 2962880a27bda9ccda6564a4ab75f580 Alistair Bush wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:58:09 +1200, Alistair Bush >> >> wrote: >>> Since it has been nearly completely implemented. Just need to >>> improve how users interact with it. [1] It is entirely my fault >>> that this is not already in use as I should have pushed this. I >>> will attempt to do the require eclass change and revbump the latest >>> java-config with a patch this week. >> What is the status here? > > java-config and documentation are done. Great, thanks! Does that include eselect java-vm though? > Next is too start bumping ebuilds and create a news item. > > Do we want to be doing the 1.4 vm's. Really think we should start pushing > them out of the tree by patching ( or removing ) the packages that depend on > them. I did 2 today, openjms and something ( openjms wasn't even a patch but > rather a property passed to ant ). > > Alistair. I agree that we should get rid of 1.4 completely. Then we can see about 1.5. Last rited 3 packages so far, removed old versions of others, will try to continue. With Betelgeuse we agreed that java5 USE flag should go away as well, so I'll be removing it, and defaulting to 1.5. Vlastimil