From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lyngv-0000dW-5I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 748EFE0838; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dsrg.mff.cuni.cz (dsrg.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.55]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E8BE0838 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vpn-ksi-dsrg.ms.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.20.92] helo=[10.10.16.171]) by dsrg.mff.cuni.cz with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LykuN-0002YM-Ji for gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:51:27 +0200 Message-ID: <49F6DFAE.8090301@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:51:26 +0200 From: Vlastimil Babka User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Gentoo Java' Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Do we need ant-1.7.0? References: <49B2880A.80303@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2bc0684a-61de-45ab-9d5f-29de90de834c X-Archives-Hash: c87c0dad14e10f1b82ea7f4ec01f41b3 Mike Weissman wrote: > Probably could just remove it, but some of the Jboss Tools I use have > issues with ant-1.7.1, the one that comes to mind is Seam, but that > is not even in portage yet. Are you willing to investigate that, or we just remove ant 1.7.0 already? The other problem with zemberek and 1.7.1 turned out to be a problem in zemberek and is now fixed :) Vlastimil