From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFS5B-0000Op-1W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:34:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A469CE0809; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slimak.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BE72E0809 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22338 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jan 2008 10:34:42 -0000 Received: from rb5cu63.net.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (89.176.226.63) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 17 Jan 2008 10:34:42 -0000 Message-ID: <478F2F42.1070903@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:34:42 +0100 From: Vlastimil Babka User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071212) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Moving Eclipse-3.3 to tree References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=4E61DE84; url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 952715a3-09c0-4568-9a9c-39e7de34b439 X-Archives-Hash: c2af0da5503303df9d67d31b4878ceab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jean-No=C3=ABl Rivasseau wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > At this point all the dependencies for Eclipse were moved to main tree > (they use the osgi eclass so they make suitable jars for Eclipse). So > there is only now for Eclipse itself to be moved there. Great! > Just wanted to check that junit-4.4-r1, which was also moved to tree, > does not trigger circular dependencies anymore (I checked on the > bugzilla and it seems it is ok). It really shouldn't now, I fixed all old junit depends to 3.8*. Also the junit in tree depends on hamcrest-core and not whole hamcrest anymore so it doesn't pull all the stuff it used to, and which triggered the problem= . > For information I plan to move it as 3.3.1.1 , deleting > the ebuilds in the experimental overlay except the ali_bush latest one > (-r2). Any reason to keep it? I doubt but ali_bush please respond. Is it the timezones making communication hard? :) > Finally I need advice on the following (which is the only thing left to > be done on my agenda before putting Eclipse in tree): >=20 > 1) It looks a better Gentoo way (eg, users know about /etc/conf.d, they > may not know about eclipse.ini) Yeah but /etc/conf.d is really intended only for services, i.e. /etc/init.d/* > 2) It would have a simpler configuration syntax (pure familiar Bash > syntax resulting in things like ECLIPSE_MAX_MEMORY=3D"128M", whereas th= e > syntax in the eclipse.ini file is more obscure even for me - looks like > there should be one option per line). > What is your feedback on this? Other options could include sourcing > ~/.eclipserc, I don't like that much (it would create yet another .* > file in the home directory). Plus this is probably something to set > globally on the system. The usual way for programs is /etc/eclipserc for system-wide and ~/.eclipserc for user overrides. If you could support this, great. Not sure how much patching is involved to get rid of eclipse.ini and use this way. Caster P.S. Any plans for future splitting eclipse into more pieces? :) We need separate jface for example. There's already in java-experimental as result of serkan's effort and his eclipse-rcp.eclass but I still have doubts about this way of building from the src.zip which is only intended for source discovery when writing code in eclipse... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHjy9BtbrAj05h3oQRAhU6AKCJvV9EP3UEYRZ1/TR3603g95I0wwCgjl9g aGHl0+th8DH5U7nyvw89z1M=3D =3DFeBh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=20 gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org mailing list