Re: [gentoo-java] RFC: Deprecating java-pkg_dohtml

Re: [gentoo-java] RFC: Deprecating java-pkg_dohtml

[Vlastimil Babka]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Petteri Räty wrote:
> Historically java-pkg_dohtml was just a dummy wrapper for dohtml.
> Nowadays it does some magic to record javadocs. With the new
> java-pkg_dojavadoc function I again don't see any reason for us to have
> a separate dohtml function so I propose we deprecate java-pkg_dohtml and
> start using java-pkg_dojavadoc for javadocs and just dohtml [-r] for
> html documentation. This should help in porting packages to properly use
> dojavadoc.

Looks sane. I usually change ebuilds to dojavadoc if I touch them, for
some time now.
- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFpRlgtbrAj05h3oQRAl4ZAJwITv6sv8v1S0kcMSWrO6rAW9o4VQCfeQ3u
zwBK6JHgWEsersFRmsDJtfY=
=mGZZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-java] RFC: Deprecating java-pkg_dohtml

[Petteri Räty]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 455 bytes --]

Historically java-pkg_dohtml was just a dummy wrapper for dohtml.
Nowadays it does some magic to record javadocs. With the new
java-pkg_dojavadoc function I again don't see any reason for us to have
a separate dohtml function so I propose we deprecate java-pkg_dohtml and
start using java-pkg_dojavadoc for javadocs and just dohtml [-r] for
html documentation. This should help in porting packages to properly use
dojavadoc.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]