Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
> Joshua Nichols kirjoitti:
>> * Some packages are weird, and jar up their sources inside of their
>> upstream distfile, which we then unpack. So, we'd either need to remove
>> those jars after unpacking, or perhaps add some checks to ensure the
>> bundled jars don't contain class files
>> * Some packages have jars for like tests, or examples, or whatnot. Maybe
>> we need a variable to say what jars are ok?
>> * In some cases, we may be only replacing some jars with jar-from... but
>> perhaps not all of them, or maybe they are meant to replace a jar, but
>> the jar changed names, so both the symlink from jar-from and the
>> original are around.
>>
> 
> Probably best to go with the attached then.
> 
> Regards,
> Petteri
> 

Ok. The attached is probably what I am going to commit this week unless
someone objects.