From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G6qel-0002kI-La for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:23:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6TFMAOv009778; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:22:10 GMT Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6TFM9dh022650 for ; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:22:09 GMT Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2006 11:22:14 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id LYO99643; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:22:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 146-115-26-214.c3-0.abr-ubr1.sbo-abr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.6]) ([146.115.26.214]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2006 11:22:03 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.07,194,1151899200"; d="scan'208"; a="245940986:sNHT31219466" Message-ID: <44CB7CE1.1060107@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:21:05 -0400 From: Joshua Nichols User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060702) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alistair Bush CC: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: JNI and java versions References: <44C9F1C8.6080101@gmail.com> <44CA611A.5050900@sun.com> <44CB570A.2020401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44CB570A.2020401@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090208.44CB7CCD.0009,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.4/2006-05-04 X-Archives-Salt: 2c0486d0-099a-4516-95f2-dde8fbfd44e6 X-Archives-Hash: 038a367d46fe38ad6119d073dfa99a9a Alistair Bush wrote: > I personally haven't come across any. I am actually in the slow > process of trying to create an ebuild for JOGL. As this uses JNI I > started to wonder about the effect changes to JNI would have on the > package and how something like this could be managed within the > portage system. I would imagine that this could be a difficult > problem for a disto like gentoo. I actually had an ebuild for jogl... but forgot to commit it anywhere, and accidentally deleted it :'( If you're having any particular problems with it, I can take a look and see if anything looks familar. I remember having to hack around a bit with what arguments to pass to ant to get it to be happy. -- Joshua Nichols Gentoo/Java - Project Lead -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list