From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G6asc-0000vt-Bu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:32:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6SMVfgx007088; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:31:41 GMT Received: from slimak.dkm.cz (slimak.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6SMVejq014182 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:31:41 GMT Received: (qmail 25508 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jul 2006 22:31:40 -0000 Received: from r141.chello.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.1?) (62.24.83.141) by slimak.dkm.cz with SMTP; 28 Jul 2006 22:31:40 -0000 Message-ID: <44CA904C.6030307@seznam.cz> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:31:40 +0200 From: Caster User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060605) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Gentoo/Java staffing needs References: <44C7D4AE.20306@gentoo.org> <254054bc0607280717h5cbdc7e1xea535b0e6dce8ae5@mail.gmail.com> <44CA22C9.9030607@startnet.cz> <44CA29AF.2080605@gentoo.org> <44CA2BE7.9080209@startnet.cz> <44CA2E9A.9070802@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44CA2E9A.9070802@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k6SMVfhP007088 X-Archives-Salt: 180d789b-83b1-4514-9dd8-ae07b7cf4f28 X-Archives-Hash: 94d4a3d86edc99055bd4219e36f75a2a Joshua Nichols wrote: > Miroslav =8Aulc wrote: >> I thought that you are busy but I'm not sure whether I should submit >> bugs on experimental java to bugzilla. Maybe I do not understand the >> "experimental" word correctly. Does it mean a "lab" or "just before >> moving to sync"? >> =20 > Both really. Although, maybe it would make sense to have separate > overlays for things that really are 'experimental' versus things that > are ready to go into the tree. I agree. And people willing to help but not having the time/etc to become full gentoo devs could have commit access to the "more experimental" overlay and from there devs could review the ebuilds and if they are fine, move to the "ready/reviewed" overlay (or even main tree) - I think it's how the infamous Sunrise overlay works :) I think svn is nicer to work with than sending stuff to maillist or uploading to bugzilla, then dev needs to put it to his overlay himself for review, seems like unnecessary waste of time to me. >> I can place those ebuilds I sent you to bugzilla if you want me to, >> that's not a problem. Anyway I would appreciate feedback on the ebuild= s >> because these are my first java ebuilds and I sure missed something. >> =20 > That certainly wouldn't hurt, putting them up on bugzilla. >=20 Well, if they could be assigned to directly. Now it goes to bug wranglers, and sometimes the reactions on java bugs aren't very warm, as I can see on #gentoo-bugs :( Also, we often need to reassure Jakub that the our bug report isn't invalid because of not following migration guide etc... Maybe trac tickets could be better for making todo notes of stuff so it's somehow organized and not forgotten. There was tickets module in gentooexperimental.org Trac, but I can't see it on overlays.g.o though... Just my 2c Caster --=20 gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list