From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FupYZ-0005eI-FC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:47:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5QBkJ7E007102; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:46:19 GMT Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5QBkHZS003106 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:46:18 GMT Received: from 146-115-26-214.c3-0.abr-ubr1.sbo-abr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.3]) ([146.115.26.214]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2006 07:48:08 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,175,1149480000"; d="scan'208"; a="228327979:sNHT27782340" Message-ID: <449FC8F3.4000607@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 06:45:55 -0500 From: Joshua Nichols User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060618) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] migration-overlay entering main tree References: <449F020F.7010208@gentoo.org> <1151274048.15743.11.camel@greg.tassoneent.com> <449F1560.70001@gentoo.org> <449FBA75.2000101@seznam.cz> In-Reply-To: <449FBA75.2000101@seznam.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 698057e1-b8f4-4d67-89b7-52bdc5c59497 X-Archives-Hash: 673c69b2cb455669c9fc98a61bb2ab11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Caster wrote: > Joshua Nichols wrote: >> Indeed. I mostly want to make sure everything got into place fine. So... >> to help with this, I ask everyone try re-merging the packages formally >> in the overlay (now in the package.mask), to make sure all the distfiles >> and packages are there, and that the system continues to work. >> > > Missing ebuilds in the tree (checked also > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/ and not there > either, so I guess not rsync lag problem?) > > dev-java/ant-tasks-1.6.5-r2 > ibm-jdk-bin 1.4.2.05 and 1.5.0.02 (were my bumps bad?) - the existing > 1.5.0-r11 has broken digest because IBM changed the files (bug 130533) Whoops. Was sitting uncommitted in my tree. Should be fixed in CVS, and will take a bit to propogate. > Missing distfile/wrong version? of java-config-wrapper (bug 138015) Fixed in CVS too. > I think many people get the whole migration stuff pulled just because > they used java 1.5 faq to have 1.5 VM with generation-1. It tells you to > # echo "=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5*" >> /etc/portage/package.unmask > which overrides your package.mask for 1.5.0.07 which then tries to pull > everything... Well at least more testers for us :) That's what you get for using package.mask stuff without using precise verion atoms :-D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEn8jz8ATTzZyw6sMRAvMnAJ4l3QXChk5qzRvuNGaU0ai/T1PP1wCdF119 8nfXHsTq6KlLKoTgWKQQ6/E= =Vx1p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list