From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fuoae-0003tz-Q7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:45:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5QAi8hB005264; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:44:08 GMT Received: from smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.24.4]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5QAi7NO021785 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:44:07 GMT X-Envelope-From: cast3r@seznam.cz Received: from [195.113.27.33] (Caster@gehinom.kolej.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.27.33]) by smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5QAiMda008282 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:44:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from cast3r@seznam.cz) Message-ID: <449FBA75.2000101@seznam.cz> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:44:05 +0200 From: Caster User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060605) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] migration-overlay entering main tree References: <449F020F.7010208@gentoo.org> <1151274048.15743.11.camel@greg.tassoneent.com> <449F1560.70001@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <449F1560.70001@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 21577313-8c11-4000-bd34-c4e45ee0eef5 X-Archives-Hash: 9c5c2fda3b634b6058fa9a12d5bf12e7 Joshua Nichols wrote: > Indeed. I mostly want to make sure everything got into place fine. So... > to help with this, I ask everyone try re-merging the packages formally > in the overlay (now in the package.mask), to make sure all the distfiles > and packages are there, and that the system continues to work. > Missing ebuilds in the tree (checked also http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/ and not there either, so I guess not rsync lag problem?) dev-java/ant-tasks-1.6.5-r2 ibm-jdk-bin 1.4.2.05 and 1.5.0.02 (were my bumps bad?) - the existing 1.5.0-r11 has broken digest because IBM changed the files (bug 130533) Missing distfile/wrong version? of java-config-wrapper (bug 138015) I think many people get the whole migration stuff pulled just because they used java 1.5 faq to have 1.5 VM with generation-1. It tells you to # echo "=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5*" >> /etc/portage/package.unmask which overrides your package.mask for 1.5.0.07 which then tries to pull everything... Well at least more testers for us :) Caster -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list