From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FoapO-0005e6-KD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 06:50:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k596o55K009952; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 06:50:05 GMT Received: from mail.adamsbros.org (s161-184-168-211.ab.hsia.telus.net [161.184.168.211]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k596o4OW024517 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 06:50:04 GMT Received: from [192.168.7.3] (unknown [192.168.7.3]) by mail.adamsbros.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47015541AB; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 00:55:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <44891BD7.3070702@adamsbros.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:57:27 -0600 From: "Trenton D. Adams" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William L. Thomson Jr." CC: gentoo-java Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] java, tomcat5, and AMD64 References: <4487B0BB.9020808@adamsbros.org> <1149743154.24346.2.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> <4487C953.7000304@adamsbros.org> <1149773252.25569.2.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> In-Reply-To: <1149773252.25569.2.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e607d768-f792-447a-804e-0c269c65cda0 X-Archives-Hash: 1bae85891dfa46cb40112d07be5d8536 Do you also maintain sun-javamail-bin? If so, there's a new version on sun's website, 1.4. The ebuild is requiring 1.3.3. William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 00:53 -0600, Trenton D. Adams wrote: >> Any particular reason you would recommend only that tomcat? > > It's the only version actively being maintained by well me :). Tomcat > 5.0.x is old, and upstream highly recommends using only 5.5.x. They do > not want to see any new installs of 5.0.x. Plus most 5.0.x ebuilds and > etc have issues. Not so much during compile or install, but their use of > catalina.sh and etc. Lots of problems. Hopefully any 5.0.x version of > Tomcat in portage will be package masked soon. Eventually removed > entirely, once 5.5.x is added to portage. > -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list