From: Calvin Austin <caustin@spikesource.com>
To: Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org, java@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Split migration-packages
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:34:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447606BB.50600@spikesource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4470DE21.3070809@gentoo.org>
I've been working through about 130 packages to gen2 using prefix'd
builds (EAPI="prefix"), it was an interesting challenge to move
everything to JDK 5.0 and I have a few fixes and new ebuilds etc to
commit somewhere. I have the following thoughts on making JDK 5 stable.
1. source vs jars ebuilds.
I built everything from source minus one jar file. I had to drop to
source 1.4 or patch the code in some cases. However some projects are
based on maven jar repositories, getting a source version of these can
be a huge project in itself.
2. Using open source components vs certified binary components.
Downloading certified jars from Sun or other vendors was a pain, however
picking up a free implementation that may have never been certified may
be just as bad if you don't know what you are doing (and caused a long
tail of dependencies of cause)
3. Varying dependencies
I ended up with a very simple hibernate 3.1 ebuild for example, the
current migration ebuild essentially pulls in the rest of jboss
regards
calvin
Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
>As of now all packages ported to generation 2 are moved from
>gentoo-java-experimental to migration-packages.
>
>Any new migrated package has to be moved to migration-packages as well.
>It will ease integration of ported packages into the portage tree.
>
>
>
--
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-25 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-21 21:39 [gentoo-java] Split migration-packages Krzysiek Pawlik
2006-05-25 19:34 ` Calvin Austin [this message]
2006-05-28 9:07 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2006-05-28 11:16 ` robert burrell donkin
2006-06-08 6:12 ` Calvin Austin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447606BB.50600@spikesource.com \
--to=caustin@spikesource.com \
--cc=gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=java@gentoo.org \
--cc=nelchael@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox