From: Joshua Nichols <nichoj@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] migration/eclass/java-utils.eclass: line 97: [: -ge: unary operator expected
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 23:53:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4456D7B9.6060408@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44569DAB.30403@netratings.com.au>
I found the root of the problem. java-config-wrapper was installing
/usr/bin/java-config. This is basically a wrapper, as the name suggests.
java-config-1 was installing /usr/bin/java-config-1. This was the old
school java-config. java-config-2 was installing /usr/bin/java-config-2
.... AND installing the same thing to /usr/bin/java-config. A bit of an
oversight on my part, so my apologies for the inconvenience.
To fix this, I've bumped to java-config-2.0.22 and
java-config-wrapper-0.8-r2. Please update to these versions. I can't
stress how important it is keep everything in the overlay up to date,
because packages will be bumped as bugs are found and fixed.
Regardes,
Josh
Mathew Robertson wrote:
> I was also having similar problems yesterday, as I had just done a
> system update. re-emerging the java-config-wrapper has solved most of
> them - thanks for the tip.
>
> Mathew Robertson
>
> Joshua Nichols wrote:
>> Ivan Yosifov wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 19:03 schrieb Ivan Yosifov:
>>>
>>>> Am Mittwoch, 19. April 2006 18:15 schrieb Joshua Nichols:
>>>>
>>>>> Ivan Yosifov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am Dienstag, 18. April 2006 19:36 schrieb Joshua Nichols:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ivan Yosifov wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Happens while emergeing eclipse:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> home ~ # emerge -1 eclipse-sdk
>>>>>>>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Emerging (1 of 1) dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.1.2 to /
>>>>>>>>>>> checksums files ....
>>>>>>>>>>> checksums src_uri ;-) eclipse-sourceBuild-srcIncluded-3.1.2.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Checking for sufficient physical RAM
>>>>>>>> * Checking for bad CFLAGS
>>>>>>>> * Found offending option -fomit-frame-pointer in your CFLAGS
>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>> * Tip: use equery depgraph "=eclipse-sdk-3.1.2" to list all
>>>>>>>> dependencies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/portage/migration/migration/eclass/java-utils.eclass:
>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>> 97: [: -ge: unary operator expected
>>>>>>>> Detected a JDK < 1.5.0
>>>>>>>> Detected a JDK >= 1.4.2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Unpacking source...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/portage/migration/migration/ is where I've put the
>>>>>>>> migration overlay revision 2114. Bash is 3.1_p17. Is this an
>>>>>>>> eclass
>>>>>>>> bug or something else ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something else, I think. I've been working on the eclipse ebuilds
>>>>>>> (while using migration-overlay, obviously), and hadn't noticed any
>>>>>>> problems.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It might have something to do with the ebuild itself. Someone
>>>>>>> went and
>>>>>>> committed a bump to 3.1.2 without consulting with us Java folks, so
>>>>>>> I'm not sure what condition it is. Expect to see a new revision
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>> day or so...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am getting the same with the new eclipse-sdk-3.1.2-r1. I added
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> debugging output to the eclass in java-utils_is-vm-version-ge():
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- ./java-utils.eclass 2006-04-19 10:58:43.000000000 +0300
>>>>>> +++ /usr/local/portage/migration/migration/eclass/java-utils.eclass
>>>>>> 2006-04-19 11:00:25.000000000 +0300
>>>>>> @@ -91,6 +91,12 @@
>>>>>> local vm_patch=$(echo ${vm_version} | cut -d. -f3)
>>>>>> local vm_extra=$(echo ${vm_version} | cut -d. -f4)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + echo ${vm_major}
>>>>>> + echo ${vm_minor}
>>>>>> + echo ${user_major}
>>>>>> + echo ${user_minor}
>>>>>> + echo ${vm_patch}
>>>>>> + echo ${user_patch}
>>>>>> if [ ${vm_major} -ge ${user_major} ] && [ ${vm_minor} -gt
>>>>>> ${user_minor} ] ; then
>>>>>> echo "Detected a JDK >= ${user_version}"
>>>>>> return 0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and the output is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Tip: use equery depgraph "=eclipse-sdk-3.1.2-r1" to list all
>>>>>> dependencies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>> 5
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>> 5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0
>>>>>> /usr/local/portage/migration/migration/eclass/java-utils.eclass:
>>>>>> line
>>>>>> 103: [: -ge: unary operator expected
>>>>>> Detected a JDK < 1.5.0
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>> 5
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>> Detected a JDK >= 1.4.2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unpacking source...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,meaning that vm_patch is ending up empty and that seems to
>>>>>> confuse -ge
>>>>>> conditionals using it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'll have to look into this, but it probably just needs to sanity
>>>>> checking for the vm_extra and company.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aside from that, what is the original of the ebuild for eclipse
>>>>> that you
>>>>> are using? Also, which VM are you using? I haven't been able to
>>>>> quite
>>>>> reproduce this problem...
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh
>>>>>
>>>> I am using the eclipse-sdk-3.1.2-r1 ebuild from the main tree,
>>>> attached
>>>> here for reference. I have sun-jdk 1.4.2.10-r13 and 1.5.0.06-r13
>>>> installed.
>>>> The problem with vm_patch seems to be that
>>>>
>>>> java-config -f | sed -e "s/.*-\([0-9.]\+\).*/\1/" ( in
>>>> java-utils_get-vm-version )
>>>>
>>>> returns just "1.5" and so
>>>>
>>>> vm_patch=$(echo ${vm_version} | cut -d. -f3) ( in
>>>> java-utils_is-vm-version-ge ) ends up being an empty string. There
>>>> is no
>>>> third field to cut.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still an issue with eclipse-sdk-3.1.2-r2 and migration overlay
>>> revision 2129.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Could you check the contents of /usr/bin/java-config ? If it is a
>> python script, try remerging java-config-wrapper.
>>
>> I just finished helping a user in #gentoo-java that was having the
>> same issue, and that did the trick.
>>
>> Now, I need to track down why it's the original java-config, instead
>> of the new wrapper for java-config....
>>
>> - Josh
--
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-02 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-18 12:31 [gentoo-java] migration/eclass/java-utils.eclass: line 97: [: -ge: unary operator expected Ivan Yosifov
2006-04-18 16:36 ` Joshua Nichols
2006-04-19 8:08 ` Ivan Yosifov
2006-04-19 15:15 ` Joshua Nichols
2006-04-20 16:03 ` Ivan Yosifov
2006-04-25 12:18 ` Ivan Yosifov
2006-05-01 21:19 ` Joshua Nichols
2006-05-01 23:45 ` Mathew Robertson
2006-05-02 3:53 ` Joshua Nichols [this message]
2006-05-02 4:19 ` [gentoo-java] OT: eclipse auto-indent Mathew Robertson
2006-05-02 4:48 ` Qian Qiao
2006-05-02 4:50 ` Mathew Robertson
2006-05-02 18:01 ` [gentoo-java] migration/eclass/java-utils.eclass: line 97: [: -ge: unary operator expected Ivan Yosifov
2006-05-02 18:29 ` Joshua Nichols
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4456D7B9.6060408@gentoo.org \
--to=nichoj@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox