From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FQRxz-0000vU-Fv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:31:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k33GV1I9027368; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:31:01 GMT Received: from banta-im.com (roy-rogers.nfic.com [208.231.230.100]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k33GUwV0008508 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:30:58 GMT Received: from by banta-im.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06262; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:30:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44314DBF.3010304@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:30:55 -0400 From: Joshua Nichols User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vincent Schut CC: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k33GV1IX027368 X-Archives-Salt: 2afbae91-2cbf-406b-86ba-258b27c3c30b X-Archives-Hash: 2ad06746807d490309ebad0a0d3a8fcf Vincent Schut wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols=20 > wrote: > >> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: >>> Miroslav =C5=A0ulc writes: >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we=20 >>>> use >>>> bugs.gentoo.org? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much... >>> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac= ? >>> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once= ) >>> >>> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem, >>> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know=20 >>> about it >>> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or=20 >>> WONTFIX. >>> >>> >>> >> I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad.=20 >> Although, it would be preferred if bugs directly to=20 >> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, so we don't drive=20 >> bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template'=20 >> and setup a tinyurl for it: >> >> *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha* >> >> Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be=20 >> preset to be assigned to=20 >> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, block the migration=20 >> bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the title. > > I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr.=20 > 127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See=20 > the following reply > I got: > > Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay]=20 > tomcat-5.5.16 works for amd64 > To: schut@sarvision.nl > From: bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org > Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000 > > --------- start forward --------- > Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D127949 > Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D127949 > > > jakub@gentoo.org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -----=20 > > CC| |java@gentoo.org > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > Resolution| |UPSTREAM > > > > > ------- Comment #1 from jakub@gentoo.org 2006-03-29 01:05 PST ------- > Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay... > > > --Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > --------- end forward --------- Well, first, the bug you filed really doesn't have anything to do with=20 the migration overlay (because it's from the experimental overlay). That=20 being said, I was working on keywording it around the time you filed it,=20 and should be fixed. As for why it got assigned to bug-wranglers... I think there's an issue=20 with bugzilla where you can't switch between simple and expert modes for=20 filing bug. I suspect that this happened with the upgrade a bit back,=20 and you're stuck with whatever mode you were using at that time. The=20 feature for assigning directly to someone (ie java@gentoo.org) is one of=20 the features from expert, so this would explain why it didn't take effect. So, I'll try to have a word with the bug wranglers to make sure these=20 don't get resolved this way. - Josh --=20 gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list