* [gentoo-java] Bugs submission
@ 2006-03-28 11:06 Miroslav Šulc
2006-03-28 22:54 ` [gentoo-java] " Wiktor Wandachowicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miroslav Šulc @ 2006-03-28 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-java
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 122 bytes --]
Hi,
where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we use
bugs.gentoo.org?
--
Miroslav Šulc
[-- Attachment #2: miroslav.sulc.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 349 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Miroslav =C5=A0ulc
n;quoted-printable:=C5=A0ulc;Miroslav
org:StartNet s.r.o.
adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:;;Schodov=C3=A1 309/10;Praha 5;;150 00;=C4=8Cesk=C3=A1 republika
email;internet:miroslav.sulc@startnet.cz
tel;cell:+420 603 711 413
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.startnet.cz
version:2.1
end:vcard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission
2006-03-28 11:06 [gentoo-java] Bugs submission Miroslav Šulc
@ 2006-03-28 22:54 ` Wiktor Wandachowicz
2006-03-28 23:02 ` Joshua Nichols
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wiktor Wandachowicz @ 2006-03-28 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-java
Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we use
> bugs.gentoo.org?
>
I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much...
Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac?
(and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once)
But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem,
like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know about it
beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or WONTFIX.
--
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission
2006-03-28 22:54 ` [gentoo-java] " Wiktor Wandachowicz
@ 2006-03-28 23:02 ` Joshua Nichols
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Nichols @ 2006-03-28 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-java
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we use
>> bugs.gentoo.org?
>>
>>
>
> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much...
> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac?
> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once)
>
> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem,
> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know about it
> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or WONTFIX.
>
>
>
I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad. Although,
it would be preferred if bugs directly to java@gentoo.org, so we don't
drive bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template'
and setup a tinyurl for it:
*http://tinyurl.com/ofzha*
Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be
preset to be assigned to java@gentoo.org, block the migration bug, and
will have [migration-overlay] in the title.
Regards,
Josh
--
gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-28 23:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-28 11:06 [gentoo-java] Bugs submission Miroslav Šulc
2006-03-28 22:54 ` [gentoo-java] " Wiktor Wandachowicz
2006-03-28 23:02 ` Joshua Nichols
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox