From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ElVf2-0000LV-BN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:11:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBBIAC0q015594; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:10:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBBIABP8014616 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:10:12 GMT Received: from sommereik.ii.uib.no ([129.177.16.236]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ElVeF-0006xc-Gb; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:10:11 +0000 Received: from cpe0011954e7cda-cm014060001586.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([72.136.8.190]:62304 helo=[192.168.0.102]) by sommereik.ii.uib.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1ElVeD-0005Ey-TH; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:10:10 +0100 Message-ID: <439C6BA2.6070002@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:10:42 +0100 From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= CC: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Solving bug 67266 ( java-sdk-docs-1.5.0 (jdk-1_5_0-doc.zip) has wrong md5-sum ) References: <4398A52B.7090107@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4398A52B.7090107@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id jBBIAC1G015594 X-Archives-Salt: 9bfcbf44-156b-4e8b-8437-2a154b7a7bc0 X-Archives-Hash: c39fdced2c89e034acfea4cc7701af55 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > So the upstream file has changed and now the md5sum verification failes. > Attached is a patch that I came up with. I personally have bookmarked > the sdk docs in my browser so that is why I did not want to change the > installation directory, I also did not want to change the md5sum of the > existing version. I will commit this tomorrow unless someone has a > better idea on how to fix this: >=20 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67266 This is probably the best choice so far. A few ideas: 1) Instead or r1, use ${PR}, so that updates to this ebuild don't make a mess. 2) Perhaps even explain the situation to the user: If they download the file, name it ${SRC_URI} and still see md5sum failures, it will mean that they have stumbled across a different revision. This should be reported, or they should try another -rX of the jdk docs. Hurrah for inane release policies. Cheers, -- Karl T --=20 gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list