From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ERwoT-0008Cu-9I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:07:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9IJ51lR013208; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:05:01 GMT Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9IJ4jl4021252; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:04:45 GMT Received: from [192.168.150.87] (YYYMMMCCII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.10.103]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65FAD394C; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:06:59 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <435547F1.5000507@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:07:29 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org CC: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin References: <20051017185013.GE20137@vino.zko.hp.com> <20051018144615.GA9150@ytpme.telenet.be> In-Reply-To: <20051018144615.GA9150@ytpme.telenet.be> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDA197512A7DC71067CC5B988" X-Archives-Salt: 7df7de80-4b93-449c-97de-5e9e8550a526 X-Archives-Hash: 5f7d2ce417c01b122561dd56b19bf144 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDA197512A7DC71067CC5B988 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thomas Matthijs wrote: > * Aron Griffis (agriffis@gentoo.org) wrote: > >>Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the >>USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During >>the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing >>USE=nsplugin was more appropriate. >> >>http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg02898.html >> >>Unfortunately the discussion stagnated and the Java team went ahead >>with their original suggestion. >> >>At this point I think it would still be worthwhile to repair these >>ebuilds to respect USE=nsplugin and drop the browserplugin from >>use.local.desc. Comments? > > > We had discussed it prior and then nobody seemed to object to > browserplugin, only after we changed it. > > You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it. > Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change. > I discussed a possible solution to the problem with axxo the other day. Basically we should remove all the use flags and make java-config able to configure the java plugin. In the meanwhile feel free to rename the USE flags, but you can of course help the java team by improving =java-config-2.0* and adding support for plugin configuring. Regards, Petteri --------------enigDA197512A7DC71067CC5B988 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFDVUf0cxLzpIGCsLQRAoERAJ4mXkRhkxn4SWKASlbnjHPQ7ANaUACXdAzy IPeGgv4gS5Fh+vPrqIQIwA== =FUu+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDA197512A7DC71067CC5B988-- -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list