From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ORMns-0005oU-1k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:03:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82AE7E0ACD for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter66.ihug.co.nz (mailfilter66.ihug.co.nz [203.109.136.66]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52492E098F for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:53:51 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAB92IUx2XGz1/2dsb2JhbACfKXLBSoUbBI0y X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,466,1272801600"; d="scan'208";a="291003451" Received: from 118-92-108-245.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz (HELO linux.localnet) ([118.92.108.245]) by cust.filter2.content.vf.net.nz with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Jun 2010 21:53:49 +1200 From: Alistair Bush Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org, Martin von Gagern Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] jnr-netdb: upstream offers help making ebuilds easier Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:53:34 +1200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <4C21BB76.5090408@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <4C21BB76.5090408@gmx.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006232153.34483.ali_bush@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4c6ce1e2-e013-4757-b17b-4d877c929c50 X-Archives-Hash: e5272fff23c26d50d374fb6d8a29ab6a Thanks Martin. Will reply to him tonight. - Alistair. > Hi! > > As you can see in the attached mail, the jnr-netdb maintainer, Wayne > Meissner, offers his help in making the build process easier. As I only > reported bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/325079 as a user, and haven't dug > deeply into this project, I don't have any strong whishes. But looking > at the ebuild, there is some sed-ing going on, which might perhaps be > avoidable if upstream used variables in a few more places. So maybe one > of you wants to suggest suitable improvements? > > Greetings, > Martin von Gagern