From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1ho5-0001uh-Dv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:41:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEE2FE08DC; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de (fmmailgate03.web.de [217.72.192.234]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E22BE08DC for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp05.web.de (fmsmtp05.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.4.166]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BE212A6CD2F for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:40:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [84.136.61.63] (helo=ana.manna.org) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1N1hn1-00023K-00 for gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:40:19 +0200 Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:34:35 +0200 From: Hanno Meyer-Thurow To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] RFC: Local Javadoc Linking Message-ID: <20091024163435.0180700b@ana.manna.org> In-Reply-To: <4AE2F802.8050904@gentoo.org> References: <20091023162229.GH29871@vulcan.guest.intuitivelyobvious.net> <4AE2F802.8050904@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: h.mth@web.de X-Sender: h.mth@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ElCc0mnR1kGR3fj5apdoJA1ChzcGDqnwYPUEW JyEULVaPFWrgaLGDhT7PEoJRaAI1yeIDofquPxsFeNOzn8D33N ahO2UMnGY= X-Archives-Salt: 2c8125ae-6eb5-4bed-94f3-f6731ec20c43 X-Archives-Hash: e7038801e8372c7b399270ccfb8f1c95 On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:50:10 +0300 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > I think we could have two use flags: > - doc: build javadoc and link to whatever is installed > - javadoc-deep: pull in all deps with [javadoc-deep?] >=20 > Better naming suggestions for the second use flag are welcome. Instead of naming it javadoc-deep maybe name it javasdk-api or javaapi-link= , or alike? That is what you asked for, right? Or still the simple way to pull in all docs with the doc use flag. :P And I do not like the approach for the first use flag. I just do not like automagic. ;) O well ... Regards, Hanno