From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M16Di-0002dE-I7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 May 2009 22:01:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4320EE0454; Mon, 4 May 2009 22:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com (mail-ew0-f165.google.com [209.85.219.165]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BCEE0454 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 22:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so4025903ewy.34 for ; Mon, 04 May 2009 15:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:subject:from:organization :x-face:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=a8e4VrAQHb3j+H3mIi+S+6fo/7Aemy3jFS0cjOa/EP4=; b=xCLtDEZAAeGJJU6ClyMDjzD+q1StyirPN60jMey6ZoPKlb2/f+O5FoBoUayQdDliEC IHbod5nvn+qFAFKXrFTEY3kepLitYiHh5EyB0rW2Cj8m81hvk4eDBA68guZzr+FI/PGd sWq7QsZ/rNrukZg9zkx3XxkX1knuzNaYYbXV4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:from:organization:x-face:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Occh0hxFqGkK9OdAckm9obzhvtGgUMN4lHjovlF/MEC1pdgu3e3Lg2qHiMf0/hBoVz on35LdZgdh6SoDuyLAFCaZECgZzDxQ5LAvC+yxKdb5+kDhB4Fw+V2H6S7tG8HFQ36/dK Bf7RVeG9fd8iNvxKMPzsOtEhV4pDiO2dAsqsg= Received: by 10.216.36.73 with SMTP id v51mr2000328wea.215.1241474464315; Mon, 04 May 2009 15:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tiulk.localnet (chello084115149052.4.graz.surfer.at [84.115.149.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm3015242eyf.14.2009.05.04.15.01.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 04 May 2009 15:01:03 -0700 (PDT) To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] java-pkg_dolauncher and emul-linux-x86-java From: Mario Fetka Organization: Privat X-Face: 'cfWQXt=t6cs`O=>n)ZZa4~6oCaF\N'0rt{b1Cs(bVy_y_H~9>:>^Lq:"yd,Cjb]UL]) =?iso-8859-15?q?x=3F7Uh=27I=5B=3Fk=7D9=5F=2ELO=7BM=5FRg=0A=09=24=23T=5Ch3T?= =?iso-8859-15?q?!Nbd0!=24!=3FwzD=5B4=60=5D?=@%Qw(5,)TTz6}dKZZ?GfcLe List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200905050001.04648.mario.fetka@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 786e9d3b-8f4c-4d53-8d2e-bed32dcd9c93 X-Archives-Hash: 54336451834091b33ad6f1e4fd82fe2d On Monday, 4. May 2009 23:13:42 you wrote: > Mario Fetka wrote: > > On Monday, 4. May 2009 22:15:51 Alistair Bush wrote: > >> Hi Mario > >> > >> Mario Fetka wrote: > >>> Hallo Java dev team, > >>> > >>> is there a way to specify the wanted java version with dolauncher > >> > >> The _minimum_ java version is already specified automagically based on > >> the [R]DEPEND variables. > >> > >> Specifically the >=virtual/jre-1.* and java-virtuals/* items. > > > > thx i alredy know this > > but is there for ex. a way to say i want on amd64 systems the app- > > emulation/emul-linux-x86-java package as the java vm to use > > i have some packages that provides only x86 native interface > > on x86 everything is ok but on amd64 you have a elf mismatch ... > > > > yes at the moent i am writing some special scripts that use java-config > > --set- vm=emul-linux-x86-java > > > > it would be greate if the java-pkg_dolauncher gets an extra parameter > > where i can say use the emul-vm or sometihg simalar like > > virtual/jre32-1.* > > > > at the momemt when you set app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java it anly > > errors out > > > > !!! ERROR: Couldn't find a VM dep > > > > thx in av > > Mario > > Create a java virtual with only emul-linux-x86-java as the provider and > make the pkg creating the launcher depend on the virtual. > > Regards, > Petteri i have created a new java-virtuals/jre32 based on the java-virtuals/jdk-with- com-sun package but it is not working (tm) http://tinyurl.com/cbdynj http://tinyurl.com/c738nq !!! ERROR: Couldn't find a VM dep thx for the help