From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCA7C-0008I6-Md for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:47:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94680E08C1; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bacchus.cwi.nl (bacchus.cwi.nl [192.16.191.9]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556B6E08C1 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (pegasus.ins.cwi.nl [192.16.196.142]) by bacchus.cwi.nl (8.13.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id m088lGBP011714 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:47:16 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:47:16 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] javatoolkit: new project layout Message-ID: <20080108084716.GB14523@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org References: <477F7510.7020505@gentoo.org> <20080105123126.GG7944@gentoo.org> <477FF6B9.6020708@gmail.com> <20080107201921.GF21604@gentoo.org> <478314A1.5060502@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478314A1.5060502@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (Linux 2.6.20-1.2925.fc6, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: 64f5aa30-c814-47e9-84a1-cca90c716f99 X-Archives-Hash: 8866d019f577f036ccaa78ae3de440fb On 08-01-2008 19:13:53 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote: > > would it be possible to do it like we do it in Portage? > > > > sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path. realpath(__file__))), "pym")) > > > > that would do the "magic" for prefix as well as that it makes > > development for you a bit easier maybe. > > > > How about we just remove it, my plan was to have all modules in > site_packages, which negates this? If it is in standard python locations, then it works well for everybody, yes. Much appreciated if you would do so. Thanks! -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org mailing list