From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GMEn6-00044p-J9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:11:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8A2AvjH003587; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:10:57 GMT Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8A2AuK9009680 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:10:56 GMT Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d42so1192729pyd for ; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:10:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=EFpbEkvrs/FLhFOZLmEaOKaekCkDTCJm9CRvIFr1jj2A26jZuoJ4KsYCmvcY+/E8RqED4llCf0f9qybMZtG4PMFlATDBXFCcJfBHeJPKhcPR7jleabipCbF7bUEjw+VWMSlk1MhT5QF484Hzma/S0yskTQfLF8fZlKZAk+wdkWU= Received: by 10.35.94.7 with SMTP id w7mr5911582pyl; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.1.1.4? ( [203.173.178.130]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id n78sm3358175pyf.2006.09.09.19.10.54; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:10:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Alistair Bush To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: Re: gcj, maven, the GPL and ebuild Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:10:58 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <45033AB8.5060500@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609101410.58446.alistair.bush@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 0d5cac34-83a4-4514-887c-22fb9a9b2a8b X-Archives-Hash: 5e33b78a8d235006b8a792232c5f1612 On Saturday 09 September 2006 23:19, Thufir wrote: > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:05:44 +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: > > Thufir wrote: > >> I've been sifting through the archives on these topics and would like a > >> status report on java. stat ;) > > > > One will be posted tomorrow after todays team meeting. > > Lucky timing for me, then :) > > >> Finally, I was amazed to read that maven is, apparently, > >> windows-centric. Very disappointing. > > > > Any source on this? > > This mailing list. There were complaints about maven being > windows-centric. Without reading back to see what esactly 'window-centric' means. This may explain why gentoo doesn't support maven currently. https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/Maven_Notes > > >> The bottom line appears to be that java for Linux sucked, got better, > >> but still sucks and will continue to suck for the foreseeable future. > >> Yes? > > > > No. > > I'm not looking for a yes/no altercation; look forward to more info :) > -Thufir Java will 'suck' until the new java system can be stabilized. After that it will 'rock'. Look around: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/ and http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/index.xml -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list