From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H6yaP-0004BS-1W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:23:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l0H0MjTT015892; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:22:45 GMT Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [72.17.152.163]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0H0MiLe002679 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:22:45 GMT Received: (qmail 22010 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2007 19:22:48 -0500 Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (HELO ?192.168.1.211?) (192.168.0.51) by mail.obsidian-studios.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2007 19:22:48 -0500 Received: from 192.168.1.211 ([192.168.1.211] helo=[192.168.1.211]) by assp.obsidian-studios.com; 16 Jan 2007 19:22:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Weka package cleanup From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-java In-Reply-To: <93e475bc0701161607s5ca219fcx1a03cca7f6acbfc3@mail.gmail.com> References: <93e475bc0701161132s19786436p8b241e22a163ec68@mail.gmail.com> <45AD2FBB.5040001@gentoo.org> <9e0cf0bf0701161234u48924125t1067de35252c6371@mail.gmail.com> <45AD3AE8.6020402@gentoo.org> <9e0cf0bf0701161255s695622abi19922367aa57799f@mail.gmail.com> <93e475bc0701161453y2488c4al4dae0e787a703b27@mail.gmail.com> <1168990676.13072.8.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> <93e475bc0701161607s5ca219fcx1a03cca7f6acbfc3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SdyEbmjrhtib871aWgV8" Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:22:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1168993366.13072.23.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: 13eec3a9-06fc-408a-88ff-a6cc3d0f1770 X-Archives-Hash: 10427b9807a9ff114b02dbeb36c70441 --=-SdyEbmjrhtib871aWgV8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 13:07 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote: >=20 > Basically the aim I have for this is too draw the attention of you > dev's to bugs that are a 'quick' fix.=20 >=20 > Therefore meeting the aim of closing bugs without you guys having to > do most of the investigation... Sounds good to me :) > I have also though of going thru bugs.gentoo.org and reassigning the > priority of bugs into categories I don't think anyone would really object to that, other than maybe some bug spam. > I also believe that there should be some bugs marked as WONTFIX, > CANTFIX. Yes, those are great. Would be nice if there was a YOUFIX :) > For example jboss https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D148383 and > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D66965 >=20 > I believe, and it will be interesting in hereing your views on this, > that bugs should only be open if they are actually going to be worked > on. Well since they are stuff that's in tree, in theory they should remain open. Till there is an alternative in tree, or fix. Otherwise closing might just cause someone else to file a new bug instead of finding the pre-existing closed one. > With jboss we now have a binary ebuild in the overlay that could > replace the existing versions and these jboss bugs could be closed.=20 Adding binary to tree, ew. Bugs closed, good. --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java --=-SdyEbmjrhtib871aWgV8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFrWxWPrChP8zZLyYRAi7PAJ9X+CeiGRXN9ozco+dobYVSWIFbCACgh5Y8 0rapZIytxY7wIVf2RsZDliQ= =iZ1h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SdyEbmjrhtib871aWgV8-- -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list