public inbox for gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Tassone <greg@tassone.net>
To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java]  Re: Sun JDK fetching
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:33:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157826802.21666.15.camel@greg.tassoneent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BCD0C88D-30A6-4AE8-84B7-8B9B74B59F77@sun.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1511 bytes --]

Great response... thanks for taking the time -- I was about to do so
myself.

On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 08:49 -0700, David Herron wrote:
> Actually we are offering Sun's JDK under a free license that allows  
> any Solaris or Linux distribution to redistribute the binary.  I've  
> been working with Joshua and Karl to help/advise them on integrating  
> Sun's JDK with Gentoo under that new license.

Thanks for assisting the Gentoo distro (and therefore all of us) in this
way.


> I just read the email thread you're responding  
> to, and it was a painful walk down memory lane.  ...  
> Hopefully between the DLJ license and the imminent  
> beginning for open source Java, that we can put all the past pain  
> behind us.

I hope *strongly* for the same.  I observe a huge amount of
idealogical-based dislike of the Java platform/language in the Open
Source world.  IMO, the overarching reason for this is due to current
licensing issues.  Without commenting on the merits of that view, I
eagerly hope for the day I can have a straight-forward, unencumbered
technical discussion with such folks on the massive value of Java.  At
least then our technical flame-wars can be based on the appropriate
topic. ;-)

Here's to the future.  I hope Sun walks openly and properly into this
new era (chooses a good OSI license, etc.) within the next month or two.
If so, IMHO, Java will become a dominating force across the Open Source
world as it has in other walks of life.

~ Greg


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-09 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <op.sqfg6rn0khw7oe@andyc>
     [not found] ` <42813AE2.7060906@gentoo.org>
     [not found]   ` <1115826068.4333.233901247@webmail.messagingengine.com>
     [not found]     ` <c3d5f38005051110193bdaf25d@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <42825462.7020200@fastmail.fm>
     [not found]         ` <c3d5f380050511123136479d61@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <1115890826.16844.233965396@webmail.messagingengine.com>
     [not found]             ` <42833248.3000909@kaffe.org>
     [not found]               ` <1115906306.11150.233981021@webmail.messagingengine.com>
2006-09-09  7:07                 ` [gentoo-java] Re: Sun JDK fetching Thufir
2006-09-09 15:49                   ` David Herron
2006-09-09 18:33                     ` Greg Tassone [this message]
2006-09-10  2:08                       ` [gentoo-java] Java Open Source - was: " David Herron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1157826802.21666.15.camel@greg.tassoneent.com \
    --to=greg@tassone.net \
    --cc=gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox