From: Greg Tassone <greg@tassone.net>
To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Split of dev-java/ ?
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:47:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152247659.8361.17.camel@greg.tassoneent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44AD7DCF.1080909@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2097 bytes --]
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:17 +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
...
> dev-java/ has currently 338 packages (and growing ;) ) - maybe it is a
> good idea to split it to multiple categories? (basic idea is much like
> with perl-core or www-apache categories).
I personally like the idea. I don't see any harm in reorganizing into
something more manageable, although some might feel it unnecessary from
a "user" perspective. I still like it, though...
As for your categories, I think they are a great start but I do have
some suggestions:
> - java-vm/ - all JDKs and JREs (sun, blackdown, kaffe, etc.. jamvm,
> sablevm ?)
I like it...
> - java-commons/ - all commons-* [ other possibility: java-jakarta - to
> have all commons-* and jakarta-* packages in it ]
> - java-libs/ - all packages providing Java API for other libraries
> (like gnome-java, libgconf-java, libgtk-java, etc...)
I would probably combine these two into one category called java-libs/
instead of having them separated. However, I don't have a big issue
with it either way.
> - java-web - WWW related packages (like template engines, web
> frameworks) [ or java-www ]
I'd probably make this one java-www/ as the "www" is consistent with
current package categories in Portage.
> - java-db - database access, persistence frameworks, JDBC
I like it...
> - java-apps - standalone Java applications - like jvmstat, jython, etc)
Hmmm, I like this one too. It is consistent with other package
categories like "www-apps/" and "sys-apps/".
> all the rest could be left in dev-java or moved (preffered?) to
> java-util/java-dev/java-misc.
I definitely agree that "dev-java/" should be changed. First of all, I
like the idea of our categories being consistent with the convention
"java-*" as you outline above. This way everything is grouped nicely
together in the tree.
Furthermore, in keeping with the "catch-all" theme that this final
category will most certainly be, I believe that "java-misc/" would be a
good choice.
Thoughts/comments?
~ Greg
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-07 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-06 21:17 [gentoo-java] Split of dev-java/ ? Krzysiek Pawlik
2006-07-07 4:47 ` Greg Tassone [this message]
2006-07-07 8:52 ` Caster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1152247659.8361.17.camel@greg.tassoneent.com \
--to=greg@tassone.net \
--cc=gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox