From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENzOB-00018R-6i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:04:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j97KssgR015098; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 20:54:54 GMT Received: from grokinc.com (grokinc.com [65.19.160.27]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j97KsqtZ002493 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 20:54:53 GMT Received: from 63.196.107.78 ([63.196.107.78]) by grokinc.com for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:03:34 -0700 Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] axxo-overlay: Request for comments/tests/feedback From: Greg Tassone To: gentoo-java@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051007162159.GA2593@ytpme.telenet.be> References: <20051007162159.GA2593@ytpme.telenet.be> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UiUrK4hG4VPkLks7P8sB" Organization: Tassone Enterprises Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:03:43 -0700 Message-Id: <1128719023.7588.20.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-java@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 08664502-0fb6-4bb9-848e-d258a797767d X-Archives-Hash: e8e80f911e9f653095ebe0db28473f61 --=-UiUrK4hG4VPkLks7P8sB Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 18:21 +0200, Thomas Matthijs wrote: > Hey, >=20 > I've been working on an overlay, where I'm trying to get things fixed so = that > 1.5 can be unmasked (finally?!) I would like some feedback/comments on _a= ny_ > part of it. > I want to make sure what I'm doing is good, and hasn't got any big holes,= or > anything like that so that it might one day be merged into the main tree. I don't have time to dig into the overlay right now, but I have the following feedback: 1. Thanks for doing this! It is HIGH TIME we got 1.5 unmasked and "stable" in the main tree. Not to mention the other things, which are useful/important. 2. Regarding bug #86900: As another comment asks in the bug history, is this one necessary if you're implementing #86903 anyway? 3. The TODO file is a little terse in places... enough so that I'm not sure we could help without having much prior context. Greg --=-UiUrK4hG4VPkLks7P8sB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDRuKvaI3pdOrDO40RApHGAJ9pBOg3WyeiG9U9ZvqGzUGQOVUaSQCfWBdI PU/e/vB5riF8vb1AuQYUI5U= =rJoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UiUrK4hG4VPkLks7P8sB-- -- gentoo-java@gentoo.org mailing list