From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEBRw-0002DD-Ot for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:28:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SKQ1Ju002410; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:26:01 GMT Received: from ulm114.server4you.de (ulm114.server4you.de [62.75.202.190]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SKQ06m011859 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:26:00 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.17] (p54B2E7E0.dip.t-dialin.net [84.178.231.224]) by ulm114.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59C820C0EB for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:26:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4404B20A.2040504@smash-net.org> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:26:50 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Norman_Rie=DF?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060131) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-installer@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] version 0.3 of the Gentoo Linux Installer References: <44044871.200@gentoo.org> <47103.141.38.43.231.1141140894.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de> <440471D4.2010006@gentoo.org> <44047382.9080804@gentoo.org> <440480D5.7000303@smash-net.org> <440481C7.7040607@gentoo.org> <4404A8AF.8010604@smash-net.org> <4404AA91.3030805@gentoo.org> <4404ADED.9060801@smash-net.org> <4404B07E.4040406@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4404B07E.4040406@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k1SKQ1KW002410 X-Archives-Salt: 40ddefa2-7441-4aea-8f8b-3ada059bb1e7 X-Archives-Hash: 710986965f08666b3c4ad7c693be3259 Andrew Gaffney schrieb: > Norman Rie=DF wrote: > >> Donnie Berkholz schrieb: >> >>> >>> >>> The portage team just got rid of exactly this capability for creating >>> difficult to reproduce USE flag setups, because they were dynamic,=20 >>> based >>> on what's installed rather than set unconditionally in make.conf. >>> >>> So it's a difficult argument to say we should re-add it into the=20 >>> installer. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Donnie >>> >>> =20 >>> >> Why difficult to reproduce? Same software should create same USE-flag=20 >> settings. >> I find it a little funny, that an official installer installes a=20 >> perhaps not working system "by default". >> I think that misses the point of an installer! > > > USE flags control optional stuff. If something doesn't work because of=20 > a missing USE flag, that's a bug with that particular ebuild. > Ok, than let it miss, don=B4t set it wrong! --=20 gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list