From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEBAQ-0000v0-8T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:09:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SK8SMT021925; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:08:28 GMT Received: from ulm114.server4you.de (ulm114.server4you.de [62.75.202.190]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SK8S2K022227 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:08:28 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.17] (p54B2E7E0.dip.t-dialin.net [84.178.231.224]) by ulm114.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868E320C0EB for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:09:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4404ADED.9060801@smash-net.org> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:09:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Norman_Rie=DF?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060131) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-installer@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] version 0.3 of the Gentoo Linux Installer References: <44044871.200@gentoo.org> <47103.141.38.43.231.1141140894.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de> <440471D4.2010006@gentoo.org> <44047382.9080804@gentoo.org> <440480D5.7000303@smash-net.org> <440481C7.7040607@gentoo.org> <4404A8AF.8010604@smash-net.org> <4404AA91.3030805@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4404AA91.3030805@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e8a516d5-cfc4-4830-af27-593d62c0198e X-Archives-Hash: 105b19c2b90f81e362f909aba382c47a Donnie Berkholz schrieb: > > >The portage team just got rid of exactly this capability for creating >difficult to reproduce USE flag setups, because they were dynamic, based >on what's installed rather than set unconditionally in make.conf. > >So it's a difficult argument to say we should re-add it into the installer. > >Thanks, >Donnie > > > Why difficult to reproduce? Same software should create same USE-flag settings. I find it a little funny, that an official installer installes a perhaps not working system "by default". I think that misses the point of an installer! -- gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list