From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESguL-0003eC-H9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:21:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KKIIdY002729; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:18:18 GMT Received: from creativecommunications.com (host124-162.rancor.birch.net [65.17.124.162]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KKIHV4014703 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:18:18 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.145] (unknown [192.168.1.145]) by creativecommunications.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286FB229C018 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:21:02 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4357FAF4.8040309@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:15:48 -0500 From: Andrew Gaffney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050916) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-installer@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? References: <20051020182857.CC2E7CA0A3@ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com> <1129834146.11559.15.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <558b73fb0510201312q7b75bd0bqb0101d2c33fdf896@mail.gmail.com> <2d28d7d90510201315p74eec085rd342d469b903912a@mail.gmail.com> <558b73fb0510201316o462086f5xb9b2b49f41119cff@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <558b73fb0510201316o462086f5xb9b2b49f41119cff@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: adf2d5fc-765d-46b3-9eae-b563eb87349e X-Archives-Hash: f35076bbb76eb72b182b46c0089d1c3a Michael Crute wrote: > On 10/20/05, *Mike Rosset* > wrote: > > I've all ready asked for those and got shot down appartently Chris > wont release them. Also Chris will try to bump this to another list > releng, more then likely > > > Why not release them? Is this not open source? What's so secret about an > iso image? Let's not start this again. It comes down to this: * they are a work in progress, constantly changing * they don't work with the released version of catalyst -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project -- gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list