From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ESh3t-0003CL-BS
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:30:53 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KKS2Go005435;
	Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:28:02 GMT
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KKS13A030179
	for <gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:28:02 GMT
Received: from h63n2fls31o917.telia.com [213.67.40.63] (helo=localhost)
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0ML21M-1ESh3f0J0Q-0000Qz; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:30:39 +0200
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:30:30 +0200
From: Alan McGinlay <root@variant.me.uk>
To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation
 method, what about later?
Message-ID: <20051020223030.6dcfd795@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20051020222624.52e53fe5@localhost>
References: <20051020182857.CC2E7CA0A3@ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com>
	<1129834146.11559.15.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	<558b73fb0510201312q7b75bd0bqb0101d2c33fdf896@mail.gmail.com>
	<2d28d7d90510201315p74eec085rd342d469b903912a@mail.gmail.com>
	<558b73fb0510201316o462086f5xb9b2b49f41119cff@mail.gmail.com>
	<4357FAF4.8040309@gentoo.org>
	<20051020222624.52e53fe5@localhost>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-installer+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-installer+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-installer+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-installer.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-installer@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:4036e3beedbfe3d1fca71359a4e178de
X-Archives-Salt: ab6f8bb1-16c2-420c-8bc8-f2fbac7fd814
X-Archives-Hash: 6f86ed1ac8f35ec3cbcdeefb3dee42d6

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:26:24 +0200
Alan McGinlay <root@variant.me.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:15:48 -0500
> Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > Michael Crute wrote:
> > > On 10/20/05, *Mike Rosset* <schizoid29@gmail.com 
> > > <mailto:schizoid29@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > 
> > >     I've all ready asked for those and got shot down appartently
> > > Chris wont release them. Also Chris will try to bump this to
> > > another list releng, more then likely
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Why not release them? Is this not open source? What's so secret
> > > about an iso image?
> > 
> > Let's not start this again. It comes down to this:
> > 
> > * they are a work in progress, constantly changing
> > * they don't work with the released version of catalyst
> > 
> 
> Why not release whatever changes you made to catalyst too then? 

Never mind, it was just answered satisfactorily with Chris Gianelloni's
most recent message.

-- 
gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list