From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESf9l-0001Kq-PX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:28:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KIQON9018843; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:26:24 GMT Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing2.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KIQLrg028086 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:26:22 GMT Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id D91611800133 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:28:57 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.232) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 20 Oct 2005 18:28:57 -0000 Received: by ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CC2E7CA0A3; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:28:57 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-installer@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "John Walsh" To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:28:57 +0800 Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? Received: from [66.169.53.212] by ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com with http for high@linuxmail.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:28:57 +0800 X-Originating-Ip: 66.169.53.212 X-Originating-Server: ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20051020182857.CC2E7CA0A3@ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j9KIQLrg028086 X-Archives-Salt: f3748b7f-f776-4925-9934-6199b44aeebe X-Archives-Hash: cf178a428e55bf25c9d7ecaad177ae2c Ok, but will the CD still ahve everything it had before, or will you be removing stuff to make room for X and all of that? If so, as I suspect, what will be taken out? Is there a place where people can look at what will be removed and maybe vote on what needs to stay? Thanks, Gabriel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Gaffney" To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:20:19 -0500 > > John Walsh wrote: > > But I like the non-X liveCD (not the minimal, the Universal), everybody has X > > livecd's and the simplicity and power of the current livecd is unmatched. > > Is there no way of keeping the same Universal LiveCD as is now > > for those users that > > prefer it? I mean, when a system is down, there is no need to > > start X and have open-office and x-chat, xine, mplayer, xmms, etc > > on the CD, but as many tools as possible, like it is now to get > > it back up. > > The universal basically is the minimal with some extras: > > universal == minimal + stages + portage snapshot > > You can easily bypass X on the X-LiveCD by passing 'nox' on the > kernel commandline. > > -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ > Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project > > -- gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list -- _______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox. Powered by Outblaze -- gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list