public inbox for gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan McGinlay <root@variant.me.uk>
To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:15:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051019201551.17a1aa85@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051019175931.5159A23D1B@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com>

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:59:31 +0800
"John Walsh" <high@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I just need some enlightenment, is the gentoo installer going to
> REPLACE the current methode or is it going to be an aleternative,
> like choosing in between expert/manual (the current method) and easy
> (the gentoo installer). The reason I ask this is because I like the
> current install method via the livecd and I use that livecd A LOT
> when I have to solve some problems on a linux (and even window$)
> partition. I wouldn't not want to be able to still use the livecd as
> it is currently usable, because I think it is the best livecd out
> there. If it is going to completely replace the current livecd
> installation method then is there going to someone at Gentoo to keep
> up the livecd tradition?
> 
> Thank you,
> Gabriel
> 

No it won't replace it, AFAIK it is intended to be in addition to the
normal method and it is _not_ intended to make installing gentoo "easy"
it is intended to (among other things) facilitate installing gentoo
onto multiple systems across a network simultaniousley and be able to
show tips etc during the install process etc. but don't
worry, the old system will still be there.

variant
-- 
gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-19 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-19 17:59 [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? John Walsh
2005-10-19 18:15 ` Alan McGinlay [this message]
2005-10-19 18:53 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-19 19:41   ` Michael Crute
2005-10-19 20:28     ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-19 20:43     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-19 20:51       ` Michael Crute
2005-10-19 21:20         ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-19 21:22         ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20  4:46           ` Jesse McNelis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-20 18:17 John Walsh
2005-10-20 18:20 ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-20 18:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 18:54   ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 19:11     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 19:00 ` Bedros Hanounik
2005-10-20 19:03   ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 19:29     ` Revrend Oddball
2005-10-20 18:28 John Walsh
2005-10-20 18:29 ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-20 18:49 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:12   ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:15     ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:16       ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:15         ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-20 20:23           ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:30             ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:34               ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:42                 ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 21:04                   ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 21:26                     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-21 13:06                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-21  3:35                     ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:57                 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:26           ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 20:30             ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 20:28           ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:51             ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:38           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:21         ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:36         ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:41           ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:54           ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 21:24             ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-21  7:41             ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 20:26     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:32       ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 18:55 ` Revrend Oddball
2005-10-20 19:13   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-22  4:05 John Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051019201551.17a1aa85@localhost \
    --to=root@variant.me.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox