From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EShvW-0006nS-QF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:26:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KLNbdc006491; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:23:37 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KLNaJU008575 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:23:36 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j9KLQER6001152 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:26:14 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:26:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <2d28d7d90510201404rb86bb65m5695863b499fa904@mail.gmail.com> References: <20051020182857.CC2E7CA0A3@ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com> <1129834146.11559.15.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <558b73fb0510201312q7b75bd0bqb0101d2c33fdf896@mail.gmail.com> <2d28d7d90510201315p74eec085rd342d469b903912a@mail.gmail.com> <558b73fb0510201316o462086f5xb9b2b49f41119cff@mail.gmail.com> <4357FAF4.8040309@gentoo.org> <2d28d7d90510201323t7d1c49fdp1b93445e932fad7e@mail.gmail.com> <558b73fb0510201330i615936e9lc9a7770ee3bd7a2c@mail.gmail.com> <2d28d7d90510201334k1935dffep680b3266f0c74bfd@mail.gmail.com> <558b73fb0510201342i36565ebaqfba2332f8ee32263@mail.gmail.com> <2d28d7d90510201404rb86bb65m5695863b499fa904@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1AlDAnBJpt7RnVrOLD50" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:26:06 -0400 Message-Id: <1129843566.11559.85.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-installer@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Archives-Salt: 128eaa90-dc98-4c1d-9cd5-724a99681003 X-Archives-Hash: 3a1b57cbff1d5fe44d2195b6da0a6778 --=-1AlDAnBJpt7RnVrOLD50 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 14:04 -0700, Mike Rosset wrote: > Honestly Michael I'm not bickering my request is valid, the installer > cd cannot be reproduced this makes it a proprietary product, its > closed. You might not have the need to modify the cd in anyway or > reproduce it in another fasion, but I do and I dont mean just any > livecd. My requirement was for it to be as close to the installer cd > as possible. So you were right the first time, why cant the spec files > along with the patch of Catalyst be released or atleast be put into > cvs access for non-end user access? It can be reproduced. I have seen several people that have been able to produce a CD that is almost identical. As I stated before, your lack of knowledge and willingness to learn is *not my problem* in any way. We don't have public CVS anyway, due to resource constraints. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-1AlDAnBJpt7RnVrOLD50 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDWAtukT4lNIS36YERAtx2AJ416T4y4QqGgzRYSF58VJ7rXcB/5QCfcb/3 bUrEbhpf1mdV0/mVQ0TI72k= =fVCL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1AlDAnBJpt7RnVrOLD50-- -- gentoo-installer@gentoo.org mailing list