public inbox for gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:22:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1129756979.720.11.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558b73fb0510191351i36e0ae6ted7ebd4f6e85060f@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1189 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 16:51 -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
> Yeah... good point... downloading 6GB of isos is for Fedora weenies.
> Guess I have kinda grown to taking that small minimal cd download size
> for granted. My next question would be then, why change anything on
> the minimal cd? Why mess with perfection; or are we going for the
> smallest iso of any distro out there? ;-)

Well, I plan on making a few changes on it.  For one, I'm switching it
to being built with uclibc.  It won't mean any real changes to
functionality, just the CD will be smaller.  There's a couple drivers
that we've been adding that are really messed up and require a ton of
work to get going.  Those I will be removing.  About the only thing
"non-essential" that I'm leaving on the CD is screen.

I'm shooting to have the CD down to <32MB, but if I can't reach that
goal, then I won't remove anything that isn't broken.  Basically, if I
can get it to 32MB removing only problematic stuff, then I'll do it.
Otherwise, it'll just be a uclibc version of what we have now.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-19 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-19 17:59 [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? John Walsh
2005-10-19 18:15 ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-19 18:53 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-19 19:41   ` Michael Crute
2005-10-19 20:28     ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-19 20:43     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-19 20:51       ` Michael Crute
2005-10-19 21:20         ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-19 21:22         ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-10-20  4:46           ` Jesse McNelis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-20 18:17 John Walsh
2005-10-20 18:20 ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-20 18:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 18:54   ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 19:11     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 19:00 ` Bedros Hanounik
2005-10-20 19:03   ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 19:29     ` Revrend Oddball
2005-10-20 18:28 John Walsh
2005-10-20 18:29 ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-20 18:49 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:12   ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:15     ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:16       ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:15         ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-10-20 20:23           ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:30             ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:34               ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:42                 ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 21:04                   ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 21:26                     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-21 13:06                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-21  3:35                     ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:57                 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:26           ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 20:30             ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 20:28           ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:51             ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:38           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:21         ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 20:36         ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:41           ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 20:54           ` Mike Rosset
2005-10-20 21:24             ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-21  7:41             ` Alan McGinlay
2005-10-20 20:26     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-20 20:32       ` Michael Crute
2005-10-20 18:55 ` Revrend Oddball
2005-10-20 19:13   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-22  4:05 John Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1129756979.720.11.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
    --to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-installer@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox