Re: [gentoo-hardened] GCC4 (again...)

[klondike <franxisco1988@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1148 bytes --]



2009/6/26 Kerin Millar <kerframil@gmail.com>:
> 2009/6/26 Kerin Millar <kerframil@gmail.com>:
>> 2009/6/26 Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> However, to be clear I think this achieves a PIE install with no SSP?  Can
>>> anyone confirm this is correct?
>>
>> That's correct.
>
> Apologies for replying to my own post, but I just realised that you
> were posing the question in the context of klondike's blog post. I do
> not know what the status of SSP is in the overlays and/or experimental
> toolchains so I'll bow out and leave it to one of the toolchain gurus
> to provide a credible response. My answer applies to the gcc ebuild in
> the mainline tree.
Although I may be wrong, AFAIK SSP works nice with almost anything except libstdc++, also packages which need it to be disabled (ie thunderbird) usually do it without a problem of after pattching a bit the ebuild. Anyway, I think the best one to answer is Zorry or Xake as they maintain it.

Anyway, at least on the overlay uclibc is still not supported :( http://github.com/Xake/toolchain-overlay/blob/54581c25b74be5a5dc3d8c1de61dba55db7c639f/README

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]