From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-hardened+bounces-962-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1H3JMK-0007Ve-Ef
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:45:48 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l06LhqKA004209;
Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:52 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l06LhpLb019266
for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:51 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF04364716
for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -0.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.105 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.143,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_10_20=1.351, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id JIghw3i3xhw6 for <gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581B664A0B
for <gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org>; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so3678251pyb
for <gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org>; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:43:43 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=kG5SZGA2bhkTry+g7sNmcYC9kjkeOWw2seMqS9vzjL5wVj3ky+FS31fBvkTCMpv18EGK6KTUtjlffFqK6JCeDT/xHWgNwvZ9R1fEfPmwRgXmABYRsKigXse4ycEczooQSlP4jV8ba7PrHbiNPRK1N3afIQnLoAFIjs+7TbLV2po=
Received: by 10.35.82.16 with SMTP id j16mr45753023pyl.1168119823624;
Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.35.8.8 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <dd2c98000701061343h3c85cfa0t2469d2faf630c2ac@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:43:43 -0500
From: "Nedim Cholich" <nedim.cholich@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-hardened] Converting new install to hardened (glibc problem)?
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-hardened+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-hardened.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590"
X-Archives-Salt: edbf2b73-df0e-42e0-992a-278be0a4c1f1
X-Archives-Hash: a29f9cb99ec3e2f498d6240f59798633
------=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
This is my first email to the list and my first attempt at installing
hardened Gentoo (I've been using Gentoo for 4 years now). I apologize if I'm
asking an obvious question. I have been searching for couple of days for an
answer but couldn't find one.
I have a fresh install of Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm trying to convert it to
hardened. I have followed instructions and changed the profile, added USE
flags and when I try to recompile the toolchain it wants to downgrade the
glibc, which is, of course, not allowed.
I've seen various posts on forms and lists but they all start with older
glibc. Also this post
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org/msg00845.html
doesn't even mention glibc, but the fact still remains that glibc will not
be emergable and the toolchain will be inconsistent.
So the question is how to get around the obvious discrepancy between glibc
version 2.4-r3 that comes with standard Gentoo and version 2.3.6-r5 that
hardened profile wants to emerge?
Thanks.
------=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,<br><br>This is my first email to the list and my first attempt at installing hardened Gentoo (I've been using Gentoo for 4 years now). I apologize if I'm asking an obvious question. I have been searching for couple of days for an answer but couldn't find one.
<br><br>I have a fresh install of Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm trying to convert it to hardened. I have followed instructions and changed the profile, added USE flags and when I try to recompile the toolchain it wants to downgrade the glibc, which is, of course, not allowed.
<br><br>I've seen various posts on forms and lists but they all start with older glibc. Also this post<br><a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org/msg00845.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org/msg00845.html
</a><br>doesn't even mention glibc, but the fact still remains that glibc will not be emergable and the toolchain will be inconsistent.<br><br>So the question is how to get around the obvious discrepancy between glibc version
2.4-r3 that comes with standard Gentoo and version 2.3.6-r5 that hardened profile wants to emerge?<br><br>Thanks.<br>
------=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590--
--
gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list