From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H3JMK-0007Ve-Ef for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:45:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l06LhqKA004209; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:52 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l06LhpLb019266 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:51 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF04364716 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.105 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.105 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_10_20=1.351, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JIghw3i3xhw6 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581B664A0B for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so3678251pyb for ; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:43:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=kG5SZGA2bhkTry+g7sNmcYC9kjkeOWw2seMqS9vzjL5wVj3ky+FS31fBvkTCMpv18EGK6KTUtjlffFqK6JCeDT/xHWgNwvZ9R1fEfPmwRgXmABYRsKigXse4ycEczooQSlP4jV8ba7PrHbiNPRK1N3afIQnLoAFIjs+7TbLV2po= Received: by 10.35.82.16 with SMTP id j16mr45753023pyl.1168119823624; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:43:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.8.8 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:43:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 16:43:43 -0500 From: "Nedim Cholich" To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-hardened] Converting new install to hardened (glibc problem)? Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590" X-Archives-Salt: edbf2b73-df0e-42e0-992a-278be0a4c1f1 X-Archives-Hash: a29f9cb99ec3e2f498d6240f59798633 ------=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, This is my first email to the list and my first attempt at installing hardened Gentoo (I've been using Gentoo for 4 years now). I apologize if I'm asking an obvious question. I have been searching for couple of days for an answer but couldn't find one. I have a fresh install of Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm trying to convert it to hardened. I have followed instructions and changed the profile, added USE flags and when I try to recompile the toolchain it wants to downgrade the glibc, which is, of course, not allowed. I've seen various posts on forms and lists but they all start with older glibc. Also this post http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org/msg00845.html doesn't even mention glibc, but the fact still remains that glibc will not be emergable and the toolchain will be inconsistent. So the question is how to get around the obvious discrepancy between glibc version 2.4-r3 that comes with standard Gentoo and version 2.3.6-r5 that hardened profile wants to emerge? Thanks. ------=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

This is my first email to the list and my first attempt at installing hardened Gentoo (I've been using Gentoo for 4 years now). I apologize if I'm asking an obvious question. I have been searching for couple of days for an answer but couldn't find one.

I have a fresh install of Gentoo 2006.1 and I'm trying to convert it to hardened. I have followed instructions and changed the profile, added USE flags and when I try to recompile the toolchain it wants to downgrade the glibc, which is, of course, not allowed.

I've seen various posts on forms and lists but they all start with older glibc. Also this post
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org/msg00845.html
doesn't even mention glibc, but the fact still remains that glibc will not be emergable and the toolchain will be inconsistent.

So the question is how to get around the obvious discrepancy between glibc version 2.4-r3 that comes with standard Gentoo and version 2.3.6-r5 that hardened profile wants to emerge?

Thanks.
------=_Part_21100_26152684.1168119823590-- -- gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list