On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Tom Hendrikx
<tom@whyscream.net> wrote:
Clemente Aguiar schreef:
> I understand that the profiles where updated recently (last year?).
>
> Available profile symlink targets:
> [1] hardened/amd64 *
> [2] hardened/amd64/multilib
> [3] selinux/2007.0/amd64
> [4] selinux/2007.0/amd64/hardened
> [5] default/linux/amd64/2008.0
> [6] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop
> [7] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/developer
> [8] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/no-multilib
> [9] default/linux/amd64/2008.0/server
> [10] hardened/linux/amd64
>
> Available profile symlink targets:
> [1] hardened/x86/2.6 *
> [2] selinux/2007.0/x86
> [3] selinux/2007.0/x86/hardened
> [4] default/linux/x86/2008.0
> [5] default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop
> [6] default/linux/x86/2008.0/developer
> [7] default/linux/x86/2008.0/server
> [8] hardened/linux/x86
>
>
> I would like to know what hardened profile I should use when I build new
> machines? (AMD64 as well as x86)
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
A few days ago I switched an x86 machine from "default/linux/x86/2008.0"
to "hardened/linux/x86/2008.0/server" after some arbitrary rummaging in
the profiles directory. This gave me no problems other than the expected
gcc-4 -> gcc-3 downgrade.
I'm not sure why this profile isn't listed in the eselect profile
listing above. It doesn't give me a big fat "unsupported profile"
warning though...
Regards,
Tom